It's not that I don't trust your sources, it's that you don't want to accept what you are looking at. You can literally go and verify those sources and calculations yourself. The previous world record photos are from a photographer that has nothing to do with the FE subject, and they are over hundreds of miles which is literally fucking impossible given the claimed radius and rates of curvature of the earth. It's very, very simple to check it, the problem is cog dis always gets in the way. This is like when I had to walk my friend step by step to show him they were manipulating data in 2020 and lying to us, and it took hours for him to start accepting certain things didnt add up, and thanks to that, he never took any stab juice.
See, this is how it always goes. First it was bouncing lasers off the moon, then you moved the next thing before moving onto the next thing. Now you're rehashing the fabled flights which have been discussed a thousand times. You don't want to examine anything for yourself, but I must explain all of this to you. I'm not complaining, just pointing that out.
First of all, no flights go over the Arctics, and none of these things are exclusive to a globe. Can you tell me how you verify ground speed over water when you're in a plane? Is it GPS? Does GPS use ECEF coordinate systems? Do planes fly assuming a stationary, non rotating plane? I know pilots, both private and commercial, I have gone over this with them too.
On the topic, it's just a coincidence that there are not an equal amount of times zone in the north and south? If I gave you a ball to divide into 24 equal sections, it would be a simple task. Yet, that's just another coincidence which would be better explained on a flat model, seeing as time zones would get larger in the south. And what do you know, there are only 14 in the Southern hemisphere. The explanation given from the globe side is hilarious. You don't need to try explain it to me, I've heard and seen the points before, but it's another thing for you to think about.
The issue is presuming that people who spend most of their time examining this topic aren't informed on the different arguments. Don't you think this would have been easily debunked by now? I thought so when in first fell into the topic.
Do you have any exclusive evidence the earth moves around the sun? Surely there must be one single bit of evidence you could point to which couldn't be explained from a geocentric point of view, right? Let's see how a PHD physicist fares in a conversation with a flat earther on the topic.
https://rumble.com/v2vx4nu-witsitgetsit-vs-phd-physicist-geocentrism-debate.html