2026-11-03T15:14:49Z https://njump.me SIGPLAN https://njump.me/npub18nl2hmffvj9mr3e05mx32zfqtqqq5um9v4ujcuhx75qlkcswjzfqdcfc2n https://cdn.discuss.systems/accounts/avatars/110/885/056/191/364/421/original/cb7854324066f66a.jpeg https://cdn.discuss.systems/accounts/avatars/110/885/056/191/364/421/original/cb7854324066f66a.jpeg https://njump.me/nevent1qqsfy5wd2ghhftywtx7gxzge34q97qfrmnhmr6c0ggg9z3ws7ddsvtczyq70a2ld99jghvw897nv69gfypvqqznnv4jhjtrjum6sr7mzp6gfyha9kpk PL researchers often want to claim that something is “usable,” “intuitive,” “easy to reason about,” etc. But how should we examine these claims without full-blown user studies? <span itemprop="mentions" itemscope itemtype="https://schema.org/Person"><a itemprop="url" href="/npub1zhyh8zf05zrpdzt0vfvq8l8752xj0p8n3nxx82ppyy0wy6wxp0tqz5vexs" class="bg-lavender dark:prose:text-neutral-50 dark:text-neutral-50 dark:bg-garnet px-1"><span>Will Crichton ⍢</span> (<span class="italic">npub1zhy…vexs</span>)</a></span> has advice. <a href="https://blog.sigplan.org/2024/11/21/evaluating-human-factors-beyond-lines-of-code/">https://blog.sigplan.org/2024/11/21/evaluating-human-factors-beyond-lines-of-code/</a> 2024-11-25T15:30:37Z