<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <updated>2026-08-07T22:10:43Z</updated>
  <generator>https://njump.me</generator>

  <title>Nostr notes by selfcustodyroundtable</title>
  <author>
    <name>selfcustodyroundtable</name>
  </author>
  <link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="https://njump.me/npub1ddeduk2zx9wpu86v2d3t0qxdgz4yymyt2ake5kll3sl6w3f2qvdqcevr7n.rss" />
  <link href="https://njump.me/npub1ddeduk2zx9wpu86v2d3t0qxdgz4yymyt2ake5kll3sl6w3f2qvdqcevr7n" />
  <id>https://njump.me/npub1ddeduk2zx9wpu86v2d3t0qxdgz4yymyt2ake5kll3sl6w3f2qvdqcevr7n</id>
  <icon>https://benjamin-jarvie.github.io/custody-roundtable/avatars/self-custody-roundtable.jpg</icon>
  <logo>https://benjamin-jarvie.github.io/custody-roundtable/avatars/self-custody-roundtable.jpg</logo>




  <entry>
    <id>https://njump.me/nevent1qqs8h5fdshpdhuphaq4kfsc5fl9gccdxtx5mu94n079kwe6fsssq56qzyp4h9hjeggc4c8slf3fk9duqe4q25snv3dtkmxjml7xrlf699gp35l90g4e</id>
    
      <title>Nostr event nevent1qqs8h5fdshpdhuphaq4kfsc5fl9gccdxtx5mu94n079kwe6fsssq56qzyp4h9hjeggc4c8slf3fk9duqe4q25snv3dtkmxjml7xrlf699gp35l90g4e</title>
    
    <link rel="alternate" href="https://njump.me/nevent1qqs8h5fdshpdhuphaq4kfsc5fl9gccdxtx5mu94n079kwe6fsssq56qzyp4h9hjeggc4c8slf3fk9duqe4q25snv3dtkmxjml7xrlf699gp35l90g4e" />
    <content type="html">
      custody roundtable relay probe, ignore
    </content>
    <updated>2026-08-07T21:57:40Z</updated>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>https://njump.me/nevent1qqsgcfhzut8hmjhj00w9xznu7e2kfekf9w608y5g5ll9vu70w6ecsjqzyp4h9hjeggc4c8slf3fk9duqe4q25snv3dtkmxjml7xrlf699gp35jnuux6</id>
    
      <title type="html">Custody Roundtable, node 1. We are building a public decision ...</title>
    
    <link rel="alternate" href="https://njump.me/nevent1qqsgcfhzut8hmjhj00w9xznu7e2kfekf9w608y5g5ll9vu70w6ecsjqzyp4h9hjeggc4c8slf3fk9duqe4q25snv3dtkmxjml7xrlf699gp35jnuux6" />
    <content type="html">
      Custody Roundtable, node 1.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;We are building a public decision tree for Bitcoin self-custody: threat models, tool paths, and the tradeoffs between them. One question at a time, compiled from expert answers. Where answers disagree, the tree branches. Nothing is forced into consensus.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;The premise is not up for debate: Bitcoin&amp;#39;s properties only hold if you are the bearer.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Node 1. Given that premise, what accountability are you actually taking on with full self-custody, versus collaborative custody (a co-signing service or third party holds one key in a multisig with you), versus leaving funds on an exchange? What did each option let you avoid, and what did it cost you?&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;One position offered to be tested rather than assumed: collaborative custody is abdication-as-a-service. You are still trusting someone else&amp;#39;s solvency, honesty, and continued willingness to cooperate, just with better branding than an exchange. Is that fair, or does collaborative custody solve a real problem, such as loss of a single key or an heir with no technical skill, that pure self-custody does not?&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Reply to this note and your answer appears on the node page, attributed to your key. Nothing you sign can be edited or deleted by us.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;This question has no deadline. It stays open for as long as the project runs, so a reply months from now is still worth having.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;&lt;a href=&#34;https://benjamin-jarvie.github.io/custody-roundtable/nodes/01-self-custody-vs-collaborative-vs-exchange.html&#34;&gt;https://benjamin-jarvie.github.io/custody-roundtable/nodes/01-self-custody-vs-collaborative-vs-exchange.html&lt;/a&gt;
    </content>
    <updated>2026-08-05T17:04:18Z</updated>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>https://njump.me/nevent1qqspmrsgve2uxfc3rg4gp2q7859ngj3ndddvcz60c82wwpg2xls6x3szyp4h9hjeggc4c8slf3fk9duqe4q25snv3dtkmxjml7xrlf699gp35cpkfct</id>
    
      <title type="html">TEST reply from the roundtable key. This one should show in the ...</title>
    
    <link rel="alternate" href="https://njump.me/nevent1qqspmrsgve2uxfc3rg4gp2q7859ngj3ndddvcz60c82wwpg2xls6x3szyp4h9hjeggc4c8slf3fk9duqe4q25snv3dtkmxjml7xrlf699gp35cpkfct" />
    <content type="html">
      In reply to &lt;a href=&#39;/nevent1qqsy3emhy3gd774wmmsmqvtqjj80t7h92kun9muemda45kk4hyqvekspz4mhxue69uhhyetvv9ujuerfw36x7tnsw43qf4tn7h&#39;&gt;nevent1q…tn7h&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br/&gt;_________________________&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;TEST reply from the roundtable key. This one should show in the default Roundtable only view.
    </content>
    <updated>2026-08-05T16:35:49Z</updated>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>https://njump.me/nevent1qqsy3emhy3gd774wmmsmqvtqjj80t7h92kun9muemda45kk4hyqvekszyp4h9hjeggc4c8slf3fk9duqe4q25snv3dtkmxjml7xrlf699gp354ncl63</id>
    
      <title type="html">TEST anchor event for Custody Roundtable node 1. Not the live ...</title>
    
    <link rel="alternate" href="https://njump.me/nevent1qqsy3emhy3gd774wmmsmqvtqjj80t7h92kun9muemda45kk4hyqvekszyp4h9hjeggc4c8slf3fk9duqe4q25snv3dtkmxjml7xrlf699gp354ncl63" />
    <content type="html">
      TEST anchor event for Custody Roundtable node 1. Not the live thread. Published to verify the comment reader end to end.
    </content>
    <updated>2026-08-05T16:35:48Z</updated>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>https://njump.me/nevent1qqsquvq2kwg64f5tld6akygzwf8xtj72wtaqq5pk0jddw7v3cytunnszyp4h9hjeggc4c8slf3fk9duqe4q25snv3dtkmxjml7xrlf699gp356yvyqv</id>
    
      <title>Nostr event nevent1qqsquvq2kwg64f5tld6akygzwf8xtj72wtaqq5pk0jddw7v3cytunnszyp4h9hjeggc4c8slf3fk9duqe4q25snv3dtkmxjml7xrlf699gp356yvyqv</title>
    
    <link rel="alternate" href="https://njump.me/nevent1qqsquvq2kwg64f5tld6akygzwf8xtj72wtaqq5pk0jddw7v3cytunnszyp4h9hjeggc4c8slf3fk9duqe4q25snv3dtkmxjml7xrlf699gp356yvyqv" />
    <content type="html">
      custody-roundtable relay connectivity probe, ignore
    </content>
    <updated>2026-08-05T16:35:14Z</updated>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>https://njump.me/nevent1qqsgmgdrcjtmjea6q6sajjvgum7p7s5sz2hxcfpvk2vlkx0k4cgvqwqzyp4h9hjeggc4c8slf3fk9duqe4q25snv3dtkmxjml7xrlf699gp35sjdqqc</id>
    
      <title type="html">Custody Roundtable, Node 1: self-custody vs. collaborative ...</title>
    
    <link rel="alternate" href="https://njump.me/nevent1qqsgmgdrcjtmjea6q6sajjvgum7p7s5sz2hxcfpvk2vlkx0k4cgvqwqzyp4h9hjeggc4c8slf3fk9duqe4q25snv3dtkmxjml7xrlf699gp35sjdqqc" />
    <content type="html">
      Custody Roundtable, Node 1: self-custody vs. collaborative custody vs. exchange. Bitcoin&amp;#39;s properties (savings that can&amp;#39;t be inflated, payments that can&amp;#39;t be censored) only hold if you are the bearer. Given that, what accountability do you actually take on with full self-custody vs. collaborative custody vs. an exchange? Full node and thread: &lt;a href=&#34;https://benjamin-jarvie.github.io/custody-roundtable/nodes/01-self-custody-vs-collaborative-vs-exchange.html&#34;&gt;https://benjamin-jarvie.github.io/custody-roundtable/nodes/01-self-custody-vs-collaborative-vs-exchange.html&lt;/a&gt;
    </content>
    <updated>2026-08-05T04:23:22Z</updated>
  </entry>

</feed>