<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <updated>2024-03-20T09:09:11Z</updated>
  <generator>https://njump.me</generator>

  <title>Nostr notes by cane</title>
  <author>
    <name>cane</name>
  </author>
  <link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="https://njump.me/npub1ru4vtz2nvae48ht7ww64u24pjej4nrt7d2rxzaqkx6jnh58kfgfqfx6gxv.rss" />
  <link href="https://njump.me/npub1ru4vtz2nvae48ht7ww64u24pjej4nrt7d2rxzaqkx6jnh58kfgfqfx6gxv" />
  <id>https://njump.me/npub1ru4vtz2nvae48ht7ww64u24pjej4nrt7d2rxzaqkx6jnh58kfgfqfx6gxv</id>
  <icon>https://i.ibb.co/vqGR0h2/b0291163-06eb-4a92-9bd7-25b489cffd14-small.png</icon>
  <logo>https://i.ibb.co/vqGR0h2/b0291163-06eb-4a92-9bd7-25b489cffd14-small.png</logo>




  <entry>
    <id>https://njump.me/nevent1qqs9l7g7h7usa9v3yuyva4h5q6y7ldtkj8dq90hlydpsgt0lfzww3hszyq0j43vf2dnhx57a0eem2h325xtx2kvd0e4gvct5zcm22w7s7e9pyp84fkw</id>
    
      <title type="html">It sounds like the base abstraction here is &amp;#34;tagging.&amp;#34; At ...</title>
    
    <link rel="alternate" href="https://njump.me/nevent1qqs9l7g7h7usa9v3yuyva4h5q6y7ldtkj8dq90hlydpsgt0lfzww3hszyq0j43vf2dnhx57a0eem2h325xtx2kvd0e4gvct5zcm22w7s7e9pyp84fkw" />
    <content type="html">
      In reply to &lt;a href=&#39;/nevent1qqsgtyp2mehrzarp3rdnnygf7z3pey7atpmam3rjgjkqsw9cj2enkxshh2tpf&#39;&gt;nevent1q…2tpf&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br/&gt;_________________________&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;It sounds like the base abstraction here is &amp;#34;tagging.&amp;#34;&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;At the protocol level, would it make sense to focus on a generic tagging system that could describe any kind of event? &lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;It seems like that would be broadly useful while still allowing clients to decide at the application level if they want to, say, use tags to describe a person&amp;#39;s relationships.
    </content>
    <updated>2023-09-05T09:09:00Z</updated>
  </entry>

</feed>