<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <updated>2026-10-16T03:56:12Z</updated>
  <generator>https://njump.me</generator>

  <title>Nostr notes by dfir.ch (Unofficial)</title>
  <author>
    <name>dfir.ch (Unofficial)</name>
  </author>
  <link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="https://njump.me/npub1rxrss7c9rduaq07t7avr0nurxl54v8sdkfa6ds75g66dfrfha3yqxr7au8.rss" />
  <link href="https://njump.me/npub1rxrss7c9rduaq07t7avr0nurxl54v8sdkfa6ds75g66dfrfha3yqxr7au8" />
  <id>https://njump.me/npub1rxrss7c9rduaq07t7avr0nurxl54v8sdkfa6ds75g66dfrfha3yqxr7au8</id>
  <icon>https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/gh/twitter/twemoji@14.0.2/assets/72x72/1f9a6.png</icon>
  <logo>https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/gh/twitter/twemoji@14.0.2/assets/72x72/1f9a6.png</logo>




  <entry>
    <id>https://njump.me/nevent1qqsrrnrldgd3725gz7mxpzvm3qk28d5f4ajh72hvf6t3xkr7ka458dszyqvcwzrmq5dhn5ple0m4sd70svm7j4s7pke8hfkr63rtf4ydxlkys5ugppq</id>
    
      <title type="html">Field Notes: Reconstructing an Attacker’s Workflow Introduction ...</title>
    
    <link rel="alternate" href="https://njump.me/nevent1qqsrrnrldgd3725gz7mxpzvm3qk28d5f4ajh72hvf6t3xkr7ka458dszyqvcwzrmq5dhn5ple0m4sd70svm7j4s7pke8hfkr63rtf4ydxlkys5ugppq" />
    <content type="html">
      Field Notes: Reconstructing an Attacker’s Workflow&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Introduction&lt;br/&gt;During a recent incident, we recovered several PowerShell scripts the attacker had left behind on disk. Instead of reconstructing every action from individual event log entries, file-system artefacts, and EDR telemetry, we could read some parts of the attacker’s workflow directly from their own code. The scripts covered several stages of post-compromise activity: command execution, credential harvesting, Active Directory reconnaissance, remote-access testing, and SMB share discovery.&lt;br/&gt;Parts of this tradecraft overlap with activity Microsoft documented in its analysis of the TerminalFix campaign, a ClickFix variant that ultimately deploys a reverse tunnel into the victim network. Among other things, Microsoft described a persistent PowerShell loop that watches a local file for commands, executes them, and writes the results to another file.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;&lt;a href=&#34;https://dfir.ch/posts/field_note_attacker_workflow/&#34;&gt;https://dfir.ch/posts/field_note_attacker_workflow/&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;#fieldnotes #attacker #workflow #reconstructing #activedirectory #microsoft #parts #powershell #edr #smb&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;#rss #feeds #linksharing #qwibbit
    </content>
    <updated>2026-10-25T03:46:06Z</updated>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>https://njump.me/nevent1qqstxeyqm0xp9hqt6053fehvr5scjqcl20mdnna2fkaeehkxwm2slrczyqvcwzrmq5dhn5ple0m4sd70svm7j4s7pke8hfkr63rtf4ydxlkysw6cmdf</id>
    
      <title type="html">Field Notes: Reconstructing an Attacker’s Workflow Introduction ...</title>
    
    <link rel="alternate" href="https://njump.me/nevent1qqstxeyqm0xp9hqt6053fehvr5scjqcl20mdnna2fkaeehkxwm2slrczyqvcwzrmq5dhn5ple0m4sd70svm7j4s7pke8hfkr63rtf4ydxlkysw6cmdf" />
    <content type="html">
      Field Notes: Reconstructing an Attacker’s Workflow&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Introduction&lt;br/&gt;During a recent incident, we recovered several PowerShell scripts the attacker had left behind on disk. Instead of reconstructing every action from individual event log entries, file-system artefacts, and EDR telemetry, we could read some parts of the attacker’s workflow directly from their own code. The scripts covered several stages of post-compromise activity: command execution, credential harvesting, Active Directory reconnaissance, remote-access testing, and SMB share discovery.&lt;br/&gt;Parts of this tradecraft overlap with activity Microsoft documented in its analysis of the TerminalFix campaign, a ClickFix variant that ultimately deploys a reverse tunnel into the victim network. Among other things, Microsoft described a persistent PowerShell loop that watches a local file for commands, executes them, and writes the results to another file.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;&lt;a href=&#34;http://localhost:1313/posts/field_note_attacker_workflow/&#34;&gt;http://localhost:1313/posts/field_note_attacker_workflow/&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;#rss #feeds #linksharing #qwibbit
    </content>
    <updated>2026-10-24T02:57:33Z</updated>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>https://njump.me/nevent1qqsr9kylmrggek7szmv7vuukx683zp4ekwftjuyfccwflt922ylxcyqzyqvcwzrmq5dhn5ple0m4sd70svm7j4s7pke8hfkr63rtf4ydxlkysdcva66</id>
    
      <title type="html">Field Notes: EtherRAT Distributed Through a Legitimate Intune ...</title>
    
    <link rel="alternate" href="https://njump.me/nevent1qqsr9kylmrggek7szmv7vuukx683zp4ekwftjuyfccwflt922ylxcyqzyqvcwzrmq5dhn5ple0m4sd70svm7j4s7pke8hfkr63rtf4ydxlkysdcva66" />
    <content type="html">
      Field Notes: EtherRAT Distributed Through a Legitimate Intune Workflow&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Introduction&lt;br/&gt;The investigation began with a Microsoft Defender for Endpoint alert for suspicious screen capture activity involving PowerShell. Examining the process ancestry revealed a larger execution chain involving FbtRYX8x.exe, a renamed Node.js runtime communicating with several public Ethereum RPC providers. The observed behavior was consistent with EtherRAT, a Node.js-based backdoor previously documented by Atos Threat Research Center, The DFIR Report, and Malwarebytes.&lt;br/&gt;Further hunting identified the same malware on four managed endpoints, all of which had received a malicious MSI through Microsoft Intune. The deployment itself was not the result of an identified compromise of Intune. Instead, the customer had imported what appeared to be a legitimate Advanced IP Scanner installer into its existing software distribution workflow, inadvertently deploying the malware to multiple systems.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;&lt;a href=&#34;https://dfir.ch/posts/field_notes_etherrat/&#34;&gt;https://dfir.ch/posts/field_notes_etherrat/&lt;/a&gt;
    </content>
    <updated>2026-10-16T03:14:55Z</updated>
  </entry>

</feed>