Nostr notes by

Nostr event nevent1qqs0rq0c3a7g37mmpv6ty8eule6z9zkf0r36kf4zcuwkakq4mf8m9qqprpmhxue69uhkummnw3ezuurpwfjhgmewwdcxzcm9qgsrat92w6pjd47uaq8kact6mgveh6l8av7p5c9nnv2wpfvthtrxleq7spc56

2026-06-07T03:13:52Z

#GypsyShit Bitcoin FilmFest (npub1rjt…mp8a)

🧡

2026-06-07T00:43:32Z

In reply to nevent1q…qc0c
_________________________

🧡

Danke DIR 🤝

2026-06-07T00:43:04Z

In reply to nevent1q…nplg
_________________________

Danke DIR 🤝

i will polish it a bit. which relay is yours?

2026-06-06T23:21:17Z

In reply to nevent1q…y6v0
_________________________

i will polish it a bit. which relay is yours?

Nostr event nevent1qqszjsntwmuplhe2qthk46lecesescfulffht5c33czwejswgqqu05cprpmhxue69uhkummnw3ezuurpwfjhgmewwdcxzcm9qgs0ys979d5ylpwvs9tx7gyp8p40s8t5yl4gvfgv300xk759qrrkrwsk33n3q

2026-06-06T10:31:59Z

yes strfry. no repo but i can share other parts except write ...

2026-06-06T22:27:36Z

In reply to nevent1q…t7au
_________________________

yes strfry. no repo but i can share other parts except write policy. because it may be gamed.

🤱nostr.mom is using AI to throttle spammy content for low WoT ...

2026-06-06T21:30:02Z

🤱nostr.mom is using AI to throttle spammy content for low WoT users based on their IP. it doesn't ban, it just throttles that IP and accept from spammer less and less. if anyone has problems with my relays, i can now blame AI 😄

checks are done on my GPUs so your IP does not leak to "big AI".

if any tool or relay is blasting to nostr.mom its low WoT users was mostly blocked anyway because that rate is only for 1 user. however high WoT users will be a different set of algorithms and not affected by this change. so for blasters: not much changed.

#naddr1qq…rfny

2026-06-06T19:15:08Z

quoting
naddr1qq…rfny

"The root problem with conventional currency is all the trust that's required to make it work." — Satoshi Nakamoto, Bitcoin P2P e-cash paper, 2009

Preface: The Contradiction at the Heart of Bitcoin

Satoshi Nakamoto's foundational insight was about trust, more specifically, about its elimination. The Bitcoin whitepaper opens with a diagnosis of the problem that had plagued every previous attempt at digital money which is the need for a trusted third party to process, verify, and authorise transactions. Banks, payment processors, governments, all of these entities occupy that intermediary role, and all of them are points of failure, censorship, and control. Bitcoin was engineered, with extraordinary precision, to make that trusted third party totally unnecessary.

This is a genuinely revolutionary thing, but it contains a contradiction that has grown more dangerous with every year of Bitcoin's adoption, one that the community has been too comfortable ignoring. While Bitcoin eliminates the trusted third party at the monetary layer, most Bitcoiners access that monetary layer through devices that are entirely subordinate to trusted third parties who are institutionally, commercially, and philosophically opposed to everything Bitcoin represents.

While you may run your own node, hold your own keys; you do all of it on a device that reports your location to Google every few minutes, routes your app installations through a duopoly that has demonstrated willingness to remove Bitcoin wallets under regulatory pressure, and is architecturally incapable of resisting an OS-level identity mandate when one arrives, as one now demonstrably is.

The trusted third party that Satoshi eliminated from money has simply migrated up the stack. It now lives in your pocket. In my opinion, GrapheneOS is a critical layer for finishing the work that Satoshi started.

GrapheneOS is a security and privacy-focused mobile operating system built on the Android Open Source Project. Founded in 2019 by the GrapheneOS Foundation, it had approximately 400,000 active users as of April 2026. It runs on Google Pixel hardware, a counterintuitive choice whose justification is rooted in hardware security requirements, not corporate allegiance.

The Coming KYC Chokehold at the OS Level

The Legislative Architecture

The most consequential threat on the horizon is not app-level censorship. It is identity verification baked directly into the operating system, in other words KYC at the device level, enforced before any app can be installed or used.

Utah passed the App Store Accountability Act in March 2025, the first US state to require app store operators to verify user ages and obtain parental consent before minors can download apps. The mechanism necessarily involves collecting identity documents such as a government ID, parental verification, account linkage. Texas followed in May 2025, Louisiana in June 2025 and California enacted the Digital Age Assurance Act in October 2025, with a critical distinction: rather than targeting app stores, it targets operating system providers directly, requiring OS-level age estimation APIs effective January 1, 2027.

California's law is the key data point. It requires device operating system providers, meaning Google at the Android level, to implement age verification at the OS layer, not the app layer. The age-estimation APIs required by this law are, technically, an identity verification infrastructure embedded in the operating system itself. Google's Play Age Signals API and Apple's Declared Age Range API were already in beta as of January 2026 in anticipation of compliance requirements.

If age verification APIs are embedded at the OS level, as California's law requires, the logical architectural extension is identity verification. An OS that can verify your age can verify your identity. App stores that already know who you are can be required to share that information with app developers, regulators, or law enforcement. The infrastructure is being built now, with child safety as the stated justification, and this is also precisely what would be required to enforce financial KYC at the device level. This will make it trivial to extend this to Digital ID and CBDC infrastructure that will likely be accompanied by a ban on “unapproved wallets”, i.e. wallets that don’t KYC their users.

Tom's Guide summarised the end state if App Store Accountability Acts become nationwide law: "App stores will have to verify the age of all users, which includes collecting personal data and documents like identity proofs, credit card info, and biometrics." Substitute "financial compliance" for "age verification" and you have described the architecture of mandatory device-level KYC.

The Bitcoin-Specific Threat

For Bitcoiners, the trajectory points to a world in which running a Bitcoin wallet on a mainstream smartphone requires first authenticating your identity to Google or Apple, who relay that information to the wallet developer, who is then legally required to apply KYC procedures before allowing the app to function. Pseudonymous Bitcoin use on a mainstream OS becomes technically impossible not because of any flaw in Bitcoin's protocol, but because the device enforces identity before the protocol can be accessed.

This to me, is not just mere speculation but the logical extension of laws that have already been passed, infrastructure that has already been built, and regulatory pressure that has already produced app-store-level Bitcoin censorship in multiple jurisdictions.

GrapheneOS is explicitly outside this architecture. It does not implement OS-level age signals, identity APIs, or compliance hooks. Its open-source code can be audited to verify the absence of these features. It cannot be compelled by legislation directed at "operating system providers" in the same way that Google, a US-listed corporation with obligations to US regulators, can be compelled. Running GrapheneOS is, for now, opting out of the compliance layer before it closes. The window is open but may not remain so indefinitely.

The OS as a Chokepoint

The Surveillance Product You Carry

Smartphones have become ubiquitous in our current society. Everything from banking, navigation to even health monitoring is now being done on a smartphone in real time. In most ways it has now become an extension of us. That said, it’s not incorrect to say that despite the fact that you are the one that paid for your phone; you actually don’t own it. It’s still ultimately the property of Google or Apple.

A Cybernews investigation documented that a stock Pixel 9 Pro running Google's Android transmits data to Google's servers approximately every 4.5 minutes. It transmits roughly one megabyte of telemetry every twelve hours while sitting idle on a nightstand. It does this even when users navigate the settings menus and explicitly opt out. The surveillance is the product where your movements through physical space have become a commodity traded on markets you never consented to join.

The implications for Bitcoin users are direct. If your device is a surveillance instrument, then your Bitcoin wallet, including its keys, its balances, its transaction patterns, its Lightning payment history, operates inside a surveillance instrument. The cryptographic integrity of your keys is intact, while the operational security of how you use them is not.

OS-Level Censorship: The Documented Record

Beyond surveillance, both major mobile operating systems have demonstrated that they will modify, restrict, or remove access to software when governments demand it.

Between July and September 2024, Apple silently removed nearly 60 VPN applications from its Russian App Store at the direction of Roskomnadzor, Russia's internet censor, more than double the 25 apps the Kremlin publicly acknowledged demanding. The App Censorship Project documented that Apple acted "without transparency or due process," removing tools that millions of Russians were using to access uncensored information.

Apple's notice to affected developers was direct: "We are writing to inform you that your app has been removed from the App Store in Russia because it contains content that is illegal in Russia." By March 2026, further waves of VPN removals in Russia were still ongoing, with Telegram's Pavel Durov publicly condemning Apple for removing VPN apps that helped users bypass Russian deep packet inspection.

In 2025, the US government requested that ICE tracking apps; RedDot and ICEBlock, which allowed people to report sightings of immigration enforcement officers, be removed from both app stores. Fight for the Future documented this as straightforward political censorship executed through platform infrastructure.

The pattern is identical in every case and it goes something like this, governments identify software that interferes with their preferred information environment, communicate their preference to Apple or Google, and the software goes poof silently, without appeal, and often with no public acknowledgment from the platforms.

The question is not whether this happens as the documented record shows that it does, at scale, across multiple jurisdictions, with accelerating frequency. The question is how long it takes before the pressure that has already been applied to VPNs, ICE trackers, and messaging apps is applied systematically to Bitcoin wallets.

The Trusted Third Party Problem, Restated

Two Layers of Trusted Third Parties

When Satoshi described eliminating trusted third parties, the target was financial intermediaries: banks, payment processors, governments with monetary authority. A trusted third party is any entity whose behaviour you must rely on but cannot verify or constrain. Bitcoin eliminates financial trusted third parties through cryptographic proof and distributed consensus, but the smartphone you use to access Bitcoin is itself governed by trusted third parties:

Google or Apple control what software you can install, what it can do, and whether it continues to work.

Your mobile carrier can observe which servers your device contacts, when, and for how long.

App store operators can delist any wallet, or other privacy preserving apps at any time, for reasons they never need to disclose.

Device manufacturers may have left undocumented backdoors and on most hardware, you cannot verify they have not.

Running Bitcoin self-custody on a standard iPhone or Android device is roughly analogous to running a full node on infrastructure owned by a bank. The cryptographic layer is fine while the infrastructure layer is not yours. The trusted third party has been removed from the monetary protocol and reintroduced at the hardware-and-OS layer, which is precisely where it can observe everything and intervene whenever political pressure makes intervention convenient.

You cannot have a permissionless monetary layer built on a permissioned infrastructure layer without the permission infrastructure eventually capturing the monetary layer or at the very least being used as a chokepoint to the users to constrain actions that the powers that be don’t like. The question is not whether this capture will be attempted, but whether the tools to resist it will be ready when the call comes.

App Store Censorship in Practice

The Documented Cases

In October 2023, MetaMask was temporarily removed from Apple's App Store. While Apple later restored the app, the episode demonstrated that major crypto wallets, regardless of their legal status; are subject to a platform review process that can be triggered without warning and resolved without explanation.

In August 2025, Google Play announced licensing requirements that would have effectively banned most non-custodial wallet applications from fifteen jurisdictions. The company reversed course after intense criticism, but the reversal is precarious. No structural constraint prevents it from being reimposed. The lesson is that the final obstacle for Bitcoin is no longer only hostile regulators, it is the platform monopolists who control app distribution channels, and who face their own regulatory pressure to restrict financial applications.

In 2025, researchers discovered malware embedded in apps on both major stores, applications that specifically targeted cryptocurrency wallets by scanning users' image galleries for seed phrase screenshots. Both companies removed the compromised apps after the fact, after millions of downloads. The platforms are reactive on user security and proactive on censorship.

The Wallet of Satoshi Warning Shot

No event better illustrates the fragility of app-store-dependent Bitcoin infrastructure than the Wallet of Satoshi withdrawal of November 2023.

At the time of its disappearance from US app stores, Wallet of Satoshi was the most popular Bitcoin Lightning wallet in the world, on pace to process over one million Lightning Network transactions that month, its largest ever. It vanished simultaneously from both the Apple App Store and Google Play Store for US customers. Wallet of Satoshi stated only that it had made the "difficult decision" to remove its app to remain "compliant" given the "turbulent regulatory climate." By January 2026, the retreat had extended to the entire European Union, as Wallet of Satoshi disabled custodial services across Germany, France, Italy, Spain, the Netherlands, and Poland in response to MiCA compliance requirements.

A custodial wallet operating through regulated app stores is subject not just to the policies of those stores, but to the regulatory jurisdiction of every country whose store it appears in. A subpoena, an investigation, or a politely worded inquiry from a regulator is sufficient to trigger withdrawal. Non-custodial wallets are not immune to this either. The relevant pressure on non-custodial wallets is not direct regulatory enforcement but platform policy. Apple and Google can delist any app at any time, citing policy violations that are deliberately vague. A non-custodial wallet developer who receives a delisting notice cannot appeal to any independent authority. Their app simply disappears.

On GrapheneOS, a Bitcoin wallet installed via APK does not pass through either store. It cannot be remotely removed by Apple or Google. It continues to function regardless of what happens to its store listing. Security updates can be delivered directly via APK or through F-Droid, the open-source app repository, with no platform intermediary in the chain.

Centralization Risk: Two Gatekeepers for Eight Billion People

The Architecture of Control

The structural problem with Google Play and the Apple App Store is not incidental to how they operate. It is their design. You cannot have a permissionless money layer built on top of a permission-dependent distribution layer. The contradiction destroys the value proposition.

Consider what control actually means in this architecture:

Distribution gate. Developers must obtain and maintain platform approval to reach users. That approval can be revoked at any time, for any reason, with no meaningful appeal process. A Bitcoin wallet that is legally compliant in every jurisdiction where it operates can still be removed for violating an app store guideline that was updated without notice.

Update control. Even installed apps stop receiving security patches if delisted. Users become progressively more vulnerable while cut off from fixes. The delisting of an app does not just prevent new downloads but it strands existing users on an unmaintained version.

Geographic kill switch. App availability can be restricted by region, instantly, without developer consent. A regulatory action in one jurisdiction cascades to all users in that region simultaneously. The Wallet of Satoshi case is the template: the app was removed from the US App Store and Google Play simultaneously, in a coordinated withdrawal across both platforms.

Payment extraction. Apple's 30% in-app purchase tax on iOS has been used to block or disadvantage crypto payment flows that compete with Apple's own financial ambitions. This is not censorship for regulatory reasons; it is censorship for commercial ones. Both motivations produce the same outcome.

Identity leverage. A new and alarming dimension emerged in early 2026: proposals from Google to require government-issued identity verification for developers who want to enable app sideloading, the installation of software outside the official store. The Electronic Frontier Foundation identified this directly: identity requirements for sideloading are a censorship tool, not a security one. Requiring developer identity does not stop malware. It stops journalists, dissidents, and anyone who depends on pseudonymous software distribution to stay safe.

The Sovereign Computing Thesis

The sovereign computing thesis that I'm laying out here is simple; if your device is compromised at the OS level, your Bitcoin keys are not safe, regardless of how good your wallet software is. GrapheneOS removes the attack surfaces and removes the gatekeepers simultaneously. It does this not through marketing but through verifiable, audited technical architecture

What GrapheneOS Actually Does: Granular Privacy Controls

Beyond security hardening, GrapheneOS implements privacy controls that standard Android does not offer:

Sensors permission covers accelerometers, gyroscopes, compasses, barometers, and thermometers. These seem innocuous but enable sophisticated attacks. Accelerometer data can reconstruct what you type on a nearby keyboard through vibration analysis. Gyroscope readings can identify you personally through your unique gait pattern. Barometer data reveals what floor of a building you occupy. Apps without sensor permission on GrapheneOS receive zeroed data, maintaining compatibility while eliminating the attack surface entirely.

Storage Scopes transforms the storage permission from all-or-nothing into granular control. When you grant storage access to an app with Storage Scopes enabled, the app believes it has full access but operates in a sandbox. It can only see files it created itself. You can selectively expose specific files or directories through the standard file picker.

Contact Scopes applies the same principle to your address book, presenting an empty contact list by default with selective exposure of specific contacts or groups. For a Bitcoin user, this means a wallet app can never exfiltrate your full contact list to correlate your social graph with your transaction graph.

Attack surface reduction is systematic. Remote, local, and proximity-based attack surfaces are reduced by making features optional and disabling them by default — NFC, Bluetooth, UWB when the screen is locked, USB data when locked. The USB-C port can be configured to charging-only at the hardware level, not just at the software level — a meaningful distinction that stock Android's toggle cannot match.

The Pixel Hardware Choice

GrapheneOS runs exclusively on Google Pixel devices because no other manufacturer meets its hardware security requirements. This creates an irony that critics enjoy pointing out: to run the most Google-free mobile operating system available, you must buy a Google phone. The irony dissolves when you understand the reasoning.

Pixel devices are the only Android hardware with unlockable bootloaders that also support proper verified boot after installing an alternative operating system. Samsung, despite its security investments, deliberately cripples devices when the bootloader is unlocked, tripping permanent hardware flags that cannot be reset. Most other manufacturers lack the necessary hardware entirely. The Titan M2 secure element, proper MTE support, and a seven-year security update commitment on Pixel 8 and later devices are prerequisites for the security guarantees GrapheneOS provides. The hardware makes the security possible.

A formal partnership announced at MWC 2026 with Motorola Mobility signals that Pixel exclusivity may not be permanent. Purpose-built GrapheneOS-compatible Motorola devices are targeting 2027 release.

Honest Tradeoffs: GrapheneOS Is Not for Everyone

The Costs of Sovereignty

Intellectual honesty requires acknowledging what GrapheneOS costs, not just what it gives you.

Pixel exclusivity is the most significant constraint. GrapheneOS runs only on Google Pixel devices. The practical implication is that users must purchase or already own a Pixel, with the Pixel 7a representing the best value in 2026 at approximately $246 refurbished, and newer Pixel 9 and 10 series models offering longer security update windows extending to 2031–2033.

Installation complexity is a real barrier. The web installer has improved dramatically, but flashing a device OS remains a non-trivial operation for non-technical users. Mistakes during installation can leave a device in an inconsistent state requiring recovery. The documentation is thorough, but "thorough" is not the same as "frictionless."

Google Pay and Google Wallet do not work. This is not a configuration issue. These applications rely on a SafetyNet attestation model that GrapheneOS deliberately does not satisfy because satisfying it would require accepting Google's verification of your device integrity rather than relying on your own verified boot chain. Users who depend on tap-to-pay must use a physical card or explore alternatives like the Curve app, which works within the sandboxed Google Play environment.

Some banking apps fail. Applications that check for rooted or modified devices may refuse to run, even with sandboxed Google Play installed. This has improved substantially as more apps have moved away from aggressive attestation checking, but it remains a real-world issue.

No seamless Google backup. Device migration is manual. Your data does not automatically transfer from one device to another. This is by design, the Google backup infrastructure is a surveillance mechanism, but it creates genuine inconvenience.

Security update longevity is tied to Pixel support windows. A Pixel 6 is reaching end-of-security-updates in October 2026. GrapheneOS can only fully provide security updates for devices that Google is still releasing patches for. Older devices receive harm reduction releases, but not complete security patches.

The Calibration

For a Bitcoiner who holds meaningful self-custody, runs Lightning payments, participates in a Bitcoin circular economy, or lives in a country where the financial or political environment is actively deteriorating: the tradeoffs lean heavily toward GrapheneOS. The security gains are material, the censorship resistance is structural, and the trajectory of OS-level KYC makes the calculus more urgent with every legislative session.

For someone who uses Bitcoin only as a speculative savings vehicle and holds it on a hardware wallet with minimal mobile interaction: the urgency is lower in the immediate term, though the direction of travel makes adoption worth planning for.

The common objection "all of this seems like a lot of work for a problem that doesn't affect ordinary people" misunderstands what is at stake. Whether you have done something wrong that surveillance might catch is beside the point. Political winds shift, and definitions of acceptable behaviour along with them. Data collected for advertising can be subpoenaed for prosecution. Information gathered by corporations can be purchased by governments, by criminals, or by anyone with modest resources and determination.

Protest attendance logged by cell tower records becomes a list when political climates shift. The value of financial privacy is not determined by whether you are doing something wrong today. It is determined by whether you want that decision, the decision about what is wrong, to be made by you or by whoever controls the infrastructure.

Bitcoin's Growth Demands Hardware Independence

The Privacy Stack for Bitcoin Users

A complete Bitcoin privacy setup on GrapheneOS extends beyond the wallet. The tools below each address a specific adversary in the surveillance and censorship model described above.

Nunchuk provides a proper on-chain wallet with multisig support and no KYC requirements, suitable for long-term Bitcoin savings where security architecture matters. It defends against both platform censorship (installed via APK, bypassing the app store) and key compromise (multisig requires multiple devices or signers to move funds).

Phoenix offers self-custodial Lightning with automatic channel management. You send and receive instantly without trusting a third party with your funds. Unlike custodial Lightning wallets, no counterparty can freeze or redirect your balance under regulatory pressure.

Silent.link eSIM can be purchased with Bitcoin and requires no identity verification, eliminating the carrier as a surveillance point for network-level metadata. Your SIM is no longer a vector linking your physical identity to your on-device activity.

Mullvad VPN requires no email for signup and accepts Bitcoin payment, routing all traffic through an encrypted tunnel with a no-logging architecture. It defeats carrier-level traffic analysis and obscures which Bitcoin nodes or services your device contacts.

Orbot routes traffic through Tor for stronger anonymity at the cost of speed, appropriate for high-sensitivity operations where metadata protection matters most, such as broadcasting transactions or communicating with a node without leaking your IP.

KeePassDX stores passwords locally with no network permission, making exfiltration impossible by design. Seed phrase backups and wallet credentials never leave the device.

Together, these components eliminate the major surveillance and censorship chokepoints that would otherwise compromise the privacy guarantees that Bitcoin's cryptography provides at the protocol layer

Conclusion: The Stack Matters

Satoshi Nakamoto understood that the root problem with conventional currency was trust. He built Bitcoin to be trustless at the monetary layer and to make it mathematically impossible for any party to censor your transactions, inflate your savings, or seize your funds without your private key. However, a trustless monetary layer running on a trusted-third-party device stack is not trustless. It is trustless at the layer we examined in 2009 and trusted at the layers we overlooked until now.

The phone in your pocket, if it runs standard iOS or Android, is a surveillance instrument that reports your location continuously, installs and removes software at the direction of corporate and governmental gatekeepers, and is now being legally required to implement identity verification infrastructure at the OS level. Running a non-custodial Bitcoin wallet on that device is like holding your own keys in a bank vault: the keys are technically yours, but the vault belongs to someone else, the vault operator has demonstrated willingness to follow government instructions, and the door can be locked from the outside.

GrapheneOS closes this gap. It is definitely not for everyone as it requires specific hardware, imposes real tradeoffs, and demands more effort than stock Android. That said, it still remains as the honest implementation of what self-custody actually requires in 2026: not just a private key, but a private device, one that cannot be remotely censored, identity-gated, telemetry-harvested, or OS-compromised by the platforms and rogue states..

You can continue requesting permission from Apple and Google for the software you run, the people you communicate with, and the transactions you make. That permission can always be revoked. The alternative is yours permanently.The cypherpunk manifesto did not propose asking permission. It proposed building systems that make permission irrelevant. Bitcoin did that for money. GrapheneOS does that for the device that holds it.

Own your own stack.

nearly 100 😘 #nevent1q…rcd5

2026-06-06T13:35:22Z

nearly 100 😘

quoting
nevent1q…rcd5
The FIFA World Cup is kicking off soon, and we’re using this global event to promote Nostr and Bitcoin to a wider audience.
That’s why we’ve launched an exciting Prediction Game powered by Nostr events, with Sats as the prize money.
The entire prize pool is held securely in a Cashu Mint. Every participant receives their own Nostr key — even if they sign up with just a email.

https://kickstr.einundzwanzig.dev/games/7ea5d40f-be37-4895-94cd-2adaf53f45ad

Hug a comunistas today, if you know one. You have no idea how ...

2026-06-06T13:21:10Z

Hug a comunistas today, if you know one. You have no idea how much they need it.

Werden Geheimdienste künftig nicht nur Daten, sondern auch ...

2026-06-06T12:58:12Z

Werden Geheimdienste künftig nicht nur Daten, sondern auch Bitcoin stehlen?

fabthefox (nprofile…79mx) hält dieses Szenario für realistisch und erklärt außerdem, welche zwei Konstruktionsfehler jede liberale Demokratie langfristig scheitern lassen.

Das komplette Interview erscheint morgen:

Sonntag, 10 Uhr
YouTube #HeartMoney
Link im Profil 🔗

Zwei der übelsten Sozialisten ...

2026-06-06T11:12:51Z

Zwei der übelsten Sozialisten

Sozialistenkonferenz in Bonn Die lassen mich leider nicht rein ...

2026-06-06T10:27:59Z

Sozialistenkonferenz in Bonn
Die lassen mich leider nicht rein 😄

Pleasure is all mine 😊

2026-06-05T21:45:10Z

In reply to nevent1q…q8qz
_________________________

Pleasure is all mine 😊

Gm Dune ☕🤝

2026-06-06T07:18:57Z

In reply to nevent1q…75fv
_________________________

Gm Dune ☕🤝

Amen amen 🙏🏻

2026-06-06T07:18:44Z

In reply to nevent1q…xyle
_________________________

Amen amen 🙏🏻

You can say that again

2026-06-06T07:18:35Z

In reply to nevent1q…ech6
_________________________

You can say that again

Someone smashed our car window in Italy and took everything. No ...

2026-06-06T05:54:59Z

Someone smashed our car window in Italy and took everything.
No laptop. No camera. No cash. Just suitcases full of clothes — my wife's entire wardrobe, our son's entire wardrobe. Worthless to them, everything to us. Maximum damage, minimum loot.
€400 for the window. A lifetime of small things to rebuild.
First trip with our one-year-old. They even took his first stuffed animal.
Bella Italia. 🇮🇹

1 Thessalonians 5:16-18 "Rejoice always and delight in your ...

2026-06-06T05:51:19Z

1 Thessalonians 5:16-18

"Rejoice always and delight in your faith; be unceasing and persistent in prayer; in every situation [no matter what the circumstances] be thankful and continually give thanks to God; for this is the will of God for you in Christ Jesus."

Good morning 😇☀️☕ #gm

I couldn't agree more 💯🤝

2026-06-06T05:50:20Z

In reply to nevent1q…7k0c
_________________________

I couldn't agree more 💯🤝

I'm glad you are enjoying it sir 😁🤝

2026-06-06T05:49:26Z

In reply to nevent1q…a3c0
_________________________

I'm glad you are enjoying it sir 😁🤝

Aye! 🔥🤝

2026-06-06T05:48:29Z

In reply to nevent1q…wret
_________________________

Aye! 🔥🤝

Bitcoin is pseudonymous by design, but the original architecture ...

2026-06-05T21:49:04Z

Bitcoin is pseudonymous by design, but the original architecture assumed that the dominant acquisition path would not create a permanent link between a legal identity and a wallet address from the moment of first receipt. That assumption has been systematically dismantled.

quoting
naddr1qq…82rm

The Network Is Slipping Away

Bitcoin was designed as a peer-to-peer electronic cash system secured by distributed individual participants, one CPU, one vote, no trusted third parties, no permission required. In the whitepaper's vision, the security of the monetary network would emerge organically from thousands, then millions, of individuals running software on commodity hardware, each contributing a small piece of computational work, each earning a proportional share of newly issued coins, each serving simultaneously as worker, auditor, and sovereign.

That vision is under existential pressure. Today, four mining pools; Foundry USA, AntPool, ViaBTC, and F2Pool, routinely control more than 65% of global Bitcoin hashrate. Behind each pool are publicly traded corporations with shareholders, creditors, lobbyists, and lawyers. Marathon Digital Holdings trades on NASDAQ. Riot Platforms files 10-Ks with the SEC. Bitfarms, as of April 2026, has renamed itself Keel Infrastructure and pivoted to AI data centers, with its CEO stating plainly: "We are no longer a Bitcoin company." The machines that once secured Bitcoin's ledger are being redirected to train large language models because the quarterly economics momentarily favour it.

This is the rational behaviour of institutions operating within a rational framework guided by self-interest and it is precisely the behaviour that Satoshi's design was meant to make irrelevant.

When you plug in a home miner, even a $89 Bitaxe drawing 17 watts on your bookshelf, you are not playing a slot machine. You are participating in a civilizational contest over who controls the future of money. The odds of finding a block are long, but the stakes of not trying are longer.

Mining as Power Projection

Jason Lowrey's 2023 MIT thesis, Softwar, reframes Bitcoin’s proof of work (PoW) algorithm in a fundamentally different way. His core insight is that proof-of-work is not merely a consensus mechanism but it is a form of electro-cyber power projection, a way for individuals and institutions to project real-world power into the digital domain by burning physical energy. In Lowrey's framework, Bitcoin mining is structurally analogous to bearing arms or fortifying a home: it is the digital equivalent of the individual's capacity for self-defense.

Think about what this means. In the physical world, distributed armament, the right to bear arms, the ability to defend one's home, functions as a check against tyranny. A government that wishes to coerce a population must contend with the cost and friction of doing so against millions of individually armed citizens rather than one centralized, disarmed mob. The distribution of defensive capacity is itself a security property of the social system.

Bitcoin mining is the same logic, expressed in kilowatts and SHA-256 hashes.

When hashrate is concentrated in four publicly traded corporations, the adversary; whether a hostile state, a regulatory body, or a cartel of banks, only has four targets. Four phone calls, four cease-and-desist letters and four board meetings where compliance is weighed against litigation risk.

In 2021, Marathon Digital demonstrated exactly this vulnerability when it ran an OFAC-compliant mining pool that deliberately excluded sanctioned transactions from its blocks, thus sacrificing Bitcoin's permissionlessness for legal compliance. They eventually backed down under community pressure but the precedent of financial censorship in the name of compliance was already set. Two years later, in November 2023, the Chinese based, F2 pool, also censored and excluded four transactions from blocks, in compliance with OFAC sanctions; a first for a non-US miner to comply with sanctions.

When hashrate is distributed across ten million home miners, the adversary has ten million targets. There is no phone call that reaches them all and no single regulator has the budget or the jurisdictional authority or capacity to take them down. The network becomes, in the truest sense, resistant. Just as sound money emerges from voluntary exchange and real work rather than central bank decree, a sound monetary network emerges from voluntary, distributed participation rather than corporate delegation. Friedrich Hayek's insight about the impossibility of central planning, that no single entity can aggregate the dispersed knowledge of millions of individual actors, applies with equal force to mining. No corporation can replicate the resilience that emerges from millions of individual decisions to plug in a miner.

Ludwig von Mises’ regression theorem holds that money's value traces back to its earlier commodity use, that monetary goods carry a lineage of exchange. Apply this to Bitcoin and a striking distinction emerges: mined coins and purchased coins are not the same monetary good.

Purchased Bitcoin enters the world through a KYC'd exchange, linked to your identity, reported to your government, traceable by any analytics firm. Mined Bitcoin enters through the protocol's own issuance mechanism, carrying no prior transaction history, no compliance trail, no custodian. By Mises' own framework, these are monetarily distinct goods. The mined coin is the purer form, closer to the original design, further from the surveillance apparatus being constructed around it.

Satoshi understood this. The whitepaper's "one-CPU-one-vote" principle was not a throwaway design choice. It was a philosophical commitment: that the right to participate in money creation should be accessible to any individual with a computer, not concentrated among those with capital to build data centers. Solo mining is the purest living expression of that commitment.

Imagine a Different Network

When individual actors rationally delegate security to large institutions, the equilibrium is captured and corrupted. The only stable decentralised equilibrium requires that individual participation be accessible, affordable, and actively chosen. Your marginal hash makes the network marginally more resilient. That resilience is a public good that benefits every Bitcoin holder.

Now imagine a Bitcoin network where 50% or more of global hashrate comes from home miners and small-scale soloists, individuals in apartments, basements, and small offices across 150 countries, each running one to fifty machines, each pointing hash at a solo pool or their own node, each fully sovereign over their mining decisions.

In this network, there is no block producer that any government can compel to censor transactions. There is no pool operator that OFAC can pressure into compliance and there is no CEO who can pivot to AI when the economics shift. There is definitely no board of directors that will vote to support a soft fork that benefits institutional miners at the expense of ordinary users.

This network is not a pipe dream. It is what BitTorrent already is for file sharing.

The entertainment industry spent fifteen years and hundreds of millions of dollars trying to destroy The Pirate Bay and BitTorrent. They survived lawsuits, blocks, and raids because power resided in millions of peers, not central servers. The Pirate Bay, launched in 2003, faced relentless assault: Swedish police raided its servers

in May 2006, seizing hardware and causing only three days of downtime before it returned stronger. Its founders were prosecuted, convicted in 2009, and imprisoned, yet the site persisted through domain seizures, ISP blocks across Europe, and multiple takedowns. It adapted by shifting to magnet links, distributed hash tables (DHT), peer exchange (PEX), and a network of mirrors and proxies. Centralized elements could be targeted, but the underlying torrent swarms, powered by individual users seeding and leeching across the globe; could not be extinguished

BitTorrent itself, the protocol invented by Bram Cohen in 2001, demonstrates even deeper resilience. Unlike earlier centralized services like Napster (shut down in 2001 after legal battles targeting its servers and operators) or Suprnova.org (forced offline by MPAA/RIAA pressure), BitTorrent decentralizes the actual file distribution. Data moves directly peer-to-peer in swarms; no single server holds the content. Trackers (which only coordinate introductions) became optional with DHT and magnet links. The result? Over two decades of operation despite hundreds of thousands of infringement lawsuits, ISP throttling, and regulatory scrutiny. The protocol powers massive, ongoing distribution precisely because killing any one node, site, or even country’s infrastructure barely dents the network. Every user was both consumer and defender. The network absorbed the attacks and continued functioning.

Bitcoin home mining is the same BitTorrent architecture applied to money. Every home miner is a distributed defender of the monetary network. Every Bitaxe on a desk is a node in a resilient mesh that has no single point of failure and no single point of regulatory capture. For example a home alarm system protects one household at a time, but a distributed mining network protects the monetary infrastructure of a civilization. When we talk about Bitcoin storing and transmitting trillions of dollars in value, the security architecture is not optional. It is essential, but unfortunately right now, that architecture is dangerously centralized.

The Odds Are Long. The Stakes Are Higher

On March 10, 2025, a solo miner found block 887,212, worth approximately $258,000 at the time. The device used was a Bitaxe Gamma, a single-chip ASIC running at 480 gigahashes per second. It retails for under $150 and draws less power than a night-light. On November 23, 2025, a miner running 6 terahashes per second, facing odds of 1-in-170 million per block, found a block through CKPool and claimed the full reward. In 2025 alone, 21 individual solo miners collectively earned 66 BTC, roughly $4.1 million, through solo mining.

A Bitaxe Gamma at 1.2 TH/s against a network at 1,000 EH/s has approximately a 1-in-833-billion chance of finding any given block. Over a year of continuous operation, that translates to roughly a 1-in-5.8-million chance of finding one. These are not favourable odds in any conventional sense; yet every one of those wins happened

The defeatist narrative, "the odds are too low, don't bother" is mathematically accurate but philosophically bankrupt. It mistakes the individual's probability of winning a single lottery draw for the system's probability of producing solo winners in aggregate. The difficulty algorithm guarantees that roughly one block is found every ten minutes. The question is only who finds it. If solo miners contribute zero hashrate, they guarantee zero solo wins. If they contribute even a small fraction, they guarantee some.

Moreover, the expected value calculation for a solo miner is not purely monetary. The coins earned through solo mining arrive from coinbase, from the protocol itself, not from a KYC'd exchange, not from a compliant intermediary, and definitely not from a transaction that has been reported to any financial authority. In a world of Travel Rules, Chainalysis flags, FinCEN proposals, and exchange reporting mandates, that privacy premium is real and growing. Non-KYC coins are not just preferable but they are increasingly economically distinct. You are not merely buying a “lottery ticket” for $200,000. You are buying a “lottery ticket” for $200,000 in untraceable, self-sovereign sound money, earned by doing the work that secures the network.

The thrill of possibly winning is non-trivial either. Human beings are not expected-value calculators. We play chess for the beauty of the game, grow vegetables we could buy cheaper, and brew beer in garages for the sovereignty of the act. Solo mining lives in this territory, the territory of meaning, identity, and participation. It is something you do, not something that happens to you.

Financial Privacy Is Not a Feature. It Is the Point.

Satoshi's whitepaper devotes an entire section to privacy, as a foundational design principle. The paper's underlying assumption was that people would acquire Bitcoin through mining and peer-to-peer trade, not through identity-verified exchanges. Bitcoin is pseudonymous by design, but the original architecture assumed that the dominant acquisition path would not create a permanent link between a legal identity and a wallet address from the moment of first receipt. That assumption has been systematically dismantled

Every major exchange now conducts identity verification more rigorous than most bank account openings. The on-ramps to Bitcoin are being systematically regulated into surveillance infrastructure. The coins you buy on Coinbase, Kraken, or Binance are linked to your legal identity from the moment of purchase, reportable to your government under various frameworks, traceable by any analytics firm and also potentially freezable at the custodian's discretion. Mined Bitcoin is born outside this apparatus entirely.

Solo mining, whether via home hardware or rented hashpower pointed at your own address, is one of the few remaining ways to acquire Bitcoin that is architecturally resistant to the surveillance infrastructure being built around it. Not because it is hidden or illegal, but because it operates at the protocol layer, below the compliance layer that regulators are constructing.

The best part about all this is that the entry barriers to this game have collapsed. Hashpower rentals amplify this. Platforms like Braiins, NiceHash, Rigly, and Atlas Pool let you project power immediately, without a huge capital outlay. In February 2026, a miner rented 1 petahash per second of computing power through Braiins' on-demand marketplace, paid approximately 119,000 satoshis, roughly $75 and found block 938,092, worth approximately $200,000. A 2,600x return. In the same month, another miner using AtlasPool's rental service contracted 450 petahashes per second for 90 minutes, achieving a win probability of 0.45%, and found block 936,100, worth approximately $213,000. The rental cost was estimated to be in the $150–300 range.

NiceHash's EasyMining product, a one-click, no-hardware-required solo mining package costing 0.0021 BTC (approximately $200), accounted for 17 of the 36 documented solo blocks in 2025. Nearly half of all solo block discoveries that year required no physical hardware whatsoever. Just a browser, a Bitcoin address, and a willingness to try. The economics of rented hashpower for solo mining represent a genuinely asymmetric bet. The downside is bounded: you spend $75–$200 and find nothing. The upside is a full block reward, worth $200,000–$350,000 at recent prices.

The tradeoffs always need to be taken into consideration, as rentals require platform trust, have higher per-TH cost than owning hardware, and carry counterparty risk, but for someone who wants to test the strategy before buying hardware, or to run a high-hashrate session during a network trough window, they work. The probability is very low, the cost is very low. The upside, when it lands, is transformational.

For those ready to commit more permanently, the Bitaxe ecosystem offers something that did not exist five years ago: a fully open-source, community-maintained, industrial-quality ASIC miner manufacturable by any competent electronics enthusiast. The Bitaxe Gamma runs a BM1370 chip, the same silicon architecture that powers industrial S21-class miners, in a form factor smaller than a paperback novel, drawing 17 watts, running on WiFi, configured via a browser interface, and available fully assembled for $89–$150 or as a kit for less. The schematics are public on GitHub, while the firmware, AxeOS, is actively maintained by a community of open-source contributors. You can build one from a bare printed circuit board if that’s your cup of tea.

Five Bitaxes stacked on a shelf draw 85–100 watts total, less than a desktop computer and collectively contribute 6 TH/s to Bitcoin's security. A home miner who also runs a full node is the only participant in the Bitcoin network who simultaneously validates, produces, and controls. The exchange customer does none of these. The pool miner does one. The node operator without a miner does one. The solo miner with a self-hosted node does all three, independently verifying the entire history of the chain, producing new blocks under their own rules, and receiving the reward to an address no intermediary controls. This is the full sovereignty stack

The Long Game

Laszlo Hanyecz mined Bitcoin on a CPU in 2010 and spent 10,000 coins on pizza. We tell that story as a punchline about valuation. We are missing the point. Laszlo earned those coins by running software, doing work, and participating in a system he believed in. He spent them freely, peer-to-peer, without permission, without a middleman, without a report filed anywhere. That was Bitcoin working exactly as designed.

Sixteen years later, the same design is available to you, albeit with better hardware, better software, better tools, and higher stakes. The stakes, in this case, are the entire future of decentralized money. The corporations are mining your Bitcoin. The institutions are custodying your Bitcoin. The regulators are mapping your Bitcoin. The only people who can reverse this trajectory are sovereign individuals; stubborn, principled individuals who decide that the original vision is worth defending.

Proof-of-work mining is not merely a consensus mechanism or investment thesis. It is power projection in cyberspace, the digital equivalent of the individual's right to self-defence. When you mine, you are not just earning sats. You are projecting real-world energy into the digital domain, staking your claim in the monetary network, and making the network marginally harder to capture. Every hash is a vote and every block found by a home miner is proof that the system remains open. Every Bitaxe on a desk in Lagos, Riga, or Cape Town is a node in a mesh that no regulator can fully map and no corporation can fully control.

Every 10 minutes, someone finds a block. The permissioned world is desperately trying to make Bitcoin just another surveilled ledger. The counterargument fits on a desk, draws 17 watts, and is available for $89. Plug it in.

Nostr event nevent1qqsg8q3x6m94g07zdqu47pevksygwqdhvd6lyr8s97crvut50yglavcprpmhxue69uhkummnw3ezuurpwfjhgmewwdcxzcm9qgs2994ewgrzjzxlqjc9dmddt5xf4zz84g0dnnlqvtkknsxzukn696q7r7rkj

2026-06-05T17:06:42Z

Himmel, sind die alle verstrahlt. Respekt bekommt man nicht geschenkt, den muss man sich verdienen. Wenn in politischen Ämtern vernunftgeleitete Ergebnisse herauskommen, dann kommt der Respekt von ganz alleine. Kommt Mist, wie derzeit leider zu oft, kann auch kein Respekt entstehen, weil Respekt auf Mist nicht wächst.

Der Kolumnistin sei herzlich ein Ausflug auf einen Berg empfohlen, wo der Wind ins eine Ohr hinein und ins andere Ohr wieder herauspfeift. Das durchlüftet das Oberstübchen ganz fein, nur so als gutgemeinter Tipp.

Still wanna see you call the bottom! Haha

2026-06-05T18:46:29Z

In reply to nevent1q…npfh
_________________________

Still wanna see you call the bottom! Haha

@npub1spd…q6j7

2026-06-05T10:42:44Z

In reply to nevent1q…rcd5
_________________________

paulinthejungle (npub1spd…q6j7)

thanks

2026-06-05T10:05:08Z

In reply to nevent1q…2elu
_________________________

thanks

Well i used to listen to him because in the beginning he had a ...

2026-06-05T09:17:29Z

In reply to nevent1q…l8pz
_________________________

Well i used to listen to him because in the beginning he had a very compelling message, wasn't that much focused on his delivery because i guess i have listened to more worse sleeping tablets than him, but that changed the moment i figured that he was a dollar maxi and was poisoning the waters with his "store of value" narratives.

The by-product of listening to too many Saylor pods

2026-06-05T09:10:08Z

In reply to nevent1q…u26e
_________________________

The by-product of listening to too many Saylor pods

Nostr event nevent1qqsdj3t0g5u59hf3qlfnzzqnevms0a3g68s3aapy6rfnt0msdtzxksgprpmhxue69uhkummnw3ezuurpwfjhgmewwdcxzcm9qgs9gcysfq5y62s4rjxlvf05psuf6s376ptlemuj0kugj4kj3c3t5qcuknvvh

2026-06-05T09:08:44Z

🚧 Keep Building 🚧 Schritt für Schritt wächst alles ...

2026-06-05T08:58:29Z

🚧 Keep Building 🚧

Schritt für Schritt wächst alles weiter. Während ich an der Webseite arbeite, entwickelt sich auch die Bitcoin Metropole jeden Tag ein Stück weiter. Dank der Unterstützung der Community kommen immer neue Ideen, Projekte und Möglichkeiten dazu. 🧡

Interesse an einem Bitcoin-Einsteigerkurs oder einem KI-Vortrag?

🌐 bitcoinmetropole.de
📧 bitcoinmetropole@proton.me

Einfach eine Nachricht schicken oder per DM melden. Jeder ist willkommen, kein Vorwissen erforderlich.

#einundzwanzig #nostr #bitcoin #artstr bitcoinmetropole (nprofile…0sqq) Einundzwanzig (nprofile…6eaa)

You can say that again! It saved me from a ton of em!

2026-06-05T08:47:45Z

In reply to nevent1q…c2vx
_________________________

You can say that again! It saved me from a ton of em!

Gm Dune 🤝

2026-06-05T08:46:53Z

In reply to nevent1q…fnd2
_________________________

Gm Dune 🤝

Gm Dune! ☕☀️

2026-06-05T07:42:56Z

In reply to nevent1q…pq3c
_________________________

Gm Dune! ☕☀️

You can say that again! It saved me from a ton of em

2026-06-05T07:36:54Z

In reply to nevent1q…kurz
_________________________

You can say that again! It saved me from a ton of em

Nostr event nevent1qqs0uga8wnwt3zu2uc9pml6wmekxz22kyptjxzzn435kp7j96xvdd8gprpmhxue69uhkummnw3ezuurpwfjhgmewwdcxzcm9qgs9gcysfq5y62s4rjxlvf05psuf6s376ptlemuj0kugj4kj3c3t5qckqrew8

2026-06-05T06:18:37Z

🎯🔥

Marvin was a true G! 👏🏻🙌🏻🔥 #nevent1q…rxgz ...

2026-06-05T06:15:44Z

Marvin was a true G! 👏🏻🙌🏻🔥

quoting
nevent1q…rxgz

“I was always willing to be reasonable until I had to be unreasonable. Sometimes reasonable men must do unreasonable things.”

Marvin Heemeyer
nevent1q…fc0g

Now that's what I call PoW on steroids! 🔥💯 ...

2026-06-05T06:13:14Z

In reply to nevent1q…u9hg
_________________________

Now that's what I call PoW on steroids! 🔥💯

I like that! 😁😁 such a fitting name

2026-06-05T06:09:47Z

In reply to nevent1q…076s
_________________________

I like that! 😁😁 such a fitting name

Proverbs 5:3-6 "For the lips of an immoral woman drip honey, ...

2026-06-05T06:09:11Z

Proverbs 5:3-6

"For the lips of an immoral woman drip honey, And her mouth is smoother than oil; But in the end she is bitter as wormwood, Sharp as a two-edged sword. Her feet go down to death, Her steps lay hold of hell. Lest you ponder her path of life— Her ways are unstable; You do not know them."

Good morning 😇☀️☕ #gm

Aye!! 🔥💯🎯

2026-06-05T05:48:18Z

In reply to nevent1q…agr7
_________________________

Aye!! 🔥💯🎯

depends on the zeroes in the equation 😃 happy to share ideas, ...

2026-06-05T01:05:11Z

In reply to nevent1q…w7sd
_________________________

depends on the zeroes in the equation 😃

happy to share ideas, gpus, experience..

for onboarding i suggest to keep the secret key not even ...

2026-06-05T00:09:13Z

In reply to nevent1q…xzcy
_________________________

for onboarding i suggest to keep the secret key not even mentioned until the user is really engaged. and maybe even fake screens for email and password but email and password just unlocks the secret key saved in the device. after user is engaged now remind her to back up the secret key because email and password is nothing, secret key is everything. now she is more confused but engaged and confused 😉 just an idea!

for battery and bandwidth do we have to skip the outbox model?

for discovery i suggest AI runners:

nevent1qqsd4u59enly6uu5e0p3gwdpct8ur7u4awag8kgler0ku5wmp3a83mqsvgdvw

Nostr event nevent1qqs8mml6tvadm2vzk4dn7ftd6y8ud0qqaq0ycgmfwphzdwdwzrre78sprpmhxue69uhkummnw3ezuurpwfjhgmewwdcxzcm9qgs9gcysfq5y62s4rjxlvf05psuf6s376ptlemuj0kugj4kj3c3t5qcdqqnzk

2026-06-04T23:35:00Z

Money that can be taken away from you isn't your money.

i think nostr needs an AI layer. clients and relays are not ...

2026-06-04T23:32:32Z

i think nostr needs an AI layer. clients and relays are not enough. people are lazy and wont wait until they curate their follows. they want immediate hit with high quality content.

the question is who will run the AI layer. what algo will the AI choose. how will clients use the resulting 'labeling' event (possibly 1985) h/t VitorPamplona (nprofile…x58v)

i am already doing processing of content for moderation. maybe i can extend it to also classify notes in terms of quality, attach keywords so it can be presented as a subreddit. then clients can say "i am interested in these keywords, but give me high quality notes". then a user dont have to see all the bitcoin trending content all the time, they can discover content in other topics..

for example i post about AI, relays, gardening and y'all have to see my every post in every topic. some gardeners probably hate my AI posts. 😃

but an AI can potentially find more relevant stuff and client can re-sort the feed for more relevance.

what i propose is some people run bots (LLMs with open source code) and label events to make them more useful for efficient distribution, if clients like the code they can use labels from the bots they like. since label events will have tags for the original content it is easy to find the raw content.

This is the way

2026-06-04T22:42:33Z

In reply to nevent1q…k56x
_________________________

This is the way

Sie töten sie in Gaza, sie töten sie in Kiew sie töten sie in ...

2026-06-04T22:06:27Z

Sie töten sie in Gaza,

sie töten sie in Kiew

sie töten sie in Moskau

sie töten sie in Tel Aviv

von uns gibt's Geld

und irgendwer ist Nazi.

Na, sie?

Schöner Tag im Paradies,

wo man gewöhnt dran ist,

das Pada fließt, wenn man brav ist

und es Teil des Lebens ist,

das man ein Arsch ist.

Sei bloß abartig.

Das machen ja alle so

und du wirsts nicht ändern

Also schweig artig

Du ****** ****

Ach ja Polemiker!

Die wahren Übeltäter!

Nicht wer böses tut,

sondern die mit Schimpfwörtern.

Schlag doch ruhig paar Mädchen tot

aber sag gefälligst "bedauerlicher Einzelfall"

und nicht "schaff die Sau zum Staatsanwalt"

sonst kommst du hier in Teufelsküche,

da wirst Du noch schnell verstümmelt,

nicht dass das jemand kümmert,

aber auch dafür fließt hier Steuergeld

arbeitet mal mehr,

die feiern Geld.

bitte bitte bitte

halte raus aus meinem Feed:

Krieg und Politik

Ich hab’s bezahlt,

damits mich nicht sieht.

~

Chaos tshirt SOLD #nostr

2026-06-04T21:07:42Z

In reply to nevent1q…6sq6
_________________________

Chaos tshirt SOLD

#nostr

it's nearly impossible to login with primal remote on a ...

2026-06-04T21:01:26Z

In reply to nevent1q…z3nx
_________________________

it's nearly impossible to login with primal remote on a cellphone, but that's what a lot of people what to do

this is it, it's hard to login with primal on a cellphone

2026-06-04T21:00:15Z

In reply to nevent1q…4cc6
_________________________

this is it, it's hard to login with primal on a cellphone