<oembed><type>rich</type><version>1.0</version><title>Laeserin wrote</title><author_name>Laeserin (npub1m4…jc2jl)</author_name><author_url>https://njump.me/npub1m4ny6hjqzepn4rxknuq94c2gpqzr29ufkkw7ttcxyak7v43n6vvsajc2jl</author_url><provider_name>njump</provider_name><provider_url>https://njump.me</provider_url><html>I mean, is it a more effective and/or efficient application of the same amount of funds?&#xA;&#xA;If I have €200k sats and I want to give them to devs, is it better to give it to a board or to donate directly? We all assume the board has the most information, which is often the case in a particular case, but is it possible across all donors?&#xA;&#xA;I suspect not. The board has one particular set of information, but not necessarily more than the entire group of donors. Each donor has a particular subset of information and can probably make educated guesses within that sphere, that would add up to more accuracy in aggregate.&#xA;&#xA;Is central planning really more efficient?</html></oembed>