<oembed><type>rich</type><version>1.0</version><title>codonaft wrote</title><author_name>codonaft (npub1al…7rg94)</author_name><author_url>https://njump.me/npub1alptdev5srcw2hxg03567p4k6xs3lgj7f6545suc0rzp0xw98svse7rg94</author_url><provider_name>njump</provider_name><provider_url>https://njump.me</provider_url><html>&gt; inform the client of the majority of trusted pubkeys agree with the report or not&#xA;&#xA;The problem with any kind of labeling from ordinary clients perspective (like YakiHonne) is scaling: it takes time to receive the reports, even more time in total will take to receive the reactions to the reports (or their NIP-45 COUNTs ideally). All this just to decide whether to show a post or not.&#xA;&#xA;Yet I think what you suggest is possible and could be useful at least for trust ranking analysis bots.&#xA;&#xA;Or if you mean to request *something like* a NIP-45 COUNT, so relays could aggregate all reaction counts to all spam reports for given posts in a *single* request—this makes a lot of sense for ordinary clients too, yes. Yet this is hard to promote such a feature because some believe this implies not-dumb-enough-relays.</html></oembed>