> What are you talking about then?
About security in all relevant meanings: the actual official scope GOS is targeting for this feature is not obvious, and it seems to be misleading.
The guy in the airport from the news, for instance, could possibly be deluded by the exact same thread responses GOS gave on their forum; he could take their "easily detected by unsophisticated adversaries" as a real counterargument rather than the straw man fallacy, take their "NSA level opposition" response, and make a dangerous conclusion: "all this means I'm safe; I can use this feature in this particular airport because they technically won't be able to get that I used that feature at all".
> Do you expect a marvel figure be born out of the Graphene install?
Nothing like that much exaggerated. I believe what I initially wanted is possible to implement, and this would work for most of the real-world scenarios I've personally and many others have run into as a routine already, and it has disadvantages like everything we choose to implement. I don't request implementing this anymore, though, as I said.
codonaft
npub1al…7rg94
2026-08-07 13:49:41 GMT
in reply to nevent1q…tm87
Author Public Key
npub1alptdev5srcw2hxg03567p4k6xs3lgj7f6545suc0rzp0xw98svse7rg94Published at
2026-08-07 13:49:41 GMTEvent JSON
{
"id": "e3d28530fe2221c143e433032ca34957b715c9646861ab59d1c298db839937b8",
"pubkey": "efc2b6e59480f0e55cc87c69af06b6d1a11fa25e4ea95a439878c41799c53c19",
"created_at": 1786110581,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [
[
"e",
"56b7bdae33c97e45750b00668acb68b750be4dffb4ac9b1592c48dee87e3e40c",
"",
"root"
],
[
"e",
"0000b07c28fa41ce525bcd9bb40d1cf3af6264cf20230a2869530425958a0218",
"wss://atlas.nostr.land/",
"reply",
"b7cf9f42a796b091e843dce919d3ef4c0dc82e029452edf0bdbcdeb9ecb93e78"
],
[
"p",
"efc2b6e59480f0e55cc87c69af06b6d1a11fa25e4ea95a439878c41799c53c19"
],
[
"p",
"b7cf9f42a796b091e843dce919d3ef4c0dc82e029452edf0bdbcdeb9ecb93e78",
"wss://atlas.nostr.land/"
]
],
"content": "\u003e What are you talking about then?\n\nAbout security in all relevant meanings: the actual official scope GOS is targeting for this feature is not obvious, and it seems to be misleading.\n\nThe guy in the airport from the news, for instance, could possibly be deluded by the exact same thread responses GOS gave on their forum; he could take their \"easily detected by unsophisticated adversaries\" as a real counterargument rather than the straw man fallacy, take their \"NSA level opposition\" response, and make a dangerous conclusion: \"all this means I'm safe; I can use this feature in this particular airport because they technically won't be able to get that I used that feature at all\".\n\n\u003e Do you expect a marvel figure be born out of the Graphene install?\n\nNothing like that much exaggerated. I believe what I initially wanted is possible to implement, and this would work for most of the real-world scenarios I've personally and many others have run into as a routine already, and it has disadvantages like everything we choose to implement. I don't request implementing this anymore, though, as I said.",
"sig": "d7e74072209c535fb34e31d307eb25ec1b5e99f6c15ed09d17893f4fb807ecc99a9e36f10f13a9416ba6562ae53f57b06e97dd37088744843e135c824cabc780"
}