š
Original date posted:2015-10-23
š Original message:On 22/10/15 20:22, Peter Todd wrote:
> FWIW multi-push OP_RETURN outputs will be standard in v0.12.0:
>
> https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/6424
>
As I said before, once the prerequisites for a better notification
method are usable in the network, I'd love to define a version 2 payment
code that uses such an better notification system.
In the meantime. every block mined shows very consistent 70% address reuse.
Anything that can bring that number down is a good thing. Even if
version 1 payment codes could only potentially drop that number from 70%
to 30% instead of to 0%, they'd still be worth using while we wait for
version 2.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: 0xEAD9E623.asc
Type: application/pgp-keys
Size: 18442 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/attachments/20151023/bcaecfa8/attachment.bin>;
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 801 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/attachments/20151023/bcaecfa8/attachment.sig>;
Justus Ranvier [ARCHIVE] /
npub1k2ā¦9qd6m
2023-06-07 19:43:51
in reply to nevent1qā¦8v29
Author Public Key
npub1k2eekmevs6gg60df75qpjw4a2atmy89vx28c8zqq5jxy64tuzrws39qd6mPublished at
2023-06-07 19:43:51Event JSON
{
"id": "f3ff2b2d8d7158f008758463573ff31025f6b8c750a3b3fbe1681033d8586f4e",
"pubkey": "b2b39b6f2c86908d3da9f500193abd5757b21cac328f838800a48c4d557c10dd",
"created_at": 1686159831,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [
[
"e",
"9bb6828e62e331ddd988f31d853a7e825173c1f158082e0c7c1ae01342918390",
"",
"root"
],
[
"e",
"ff58f593ad43936d01e2f7a895aa7cb3c5b544a0b16d3f144609c63f1ae9ff6b",
"",
"reply"
],
[
"p",
"daa2fc676a25e3b5b45644540bcbd1e1168b111427cd0e3cf19c56194fb231aa"
]
],
"content": "š
Original date posted:2015-10-23\nš Original message:On 22/10/15 20:22, Peter Todd wrote:\n\u003e FWIW multi-push OP_RETURN outputs will be standard in v0.12.0:\n\u003e \n\u003e https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/6424\n\u003e \n\nAs I said before, once the prerequisites for a better notification\nmethod are usable in the network, I'd love to define a version 2 payment\ncode that uses such an better notification system.\n\nIn the meantime. every block mined shows very consistent 70% address reuse.\n\nAnything that can bring that number down is a good thing. Even if\nversion 1 payment codes could only potentially drop that number from 70%\nto 30% instead of to 0%, they'd still be worth using while we wait for\nversion 2.\n\n-------------- next part --------------\nA non-text attachment was scrubbed...\nName: 0xEAD9E623.asc\nType: application/pgp-keys\nSize: 18442 bytes\nDesc: not available\nURL: \u003chttp://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/attachments/20151023/bcaecfa8/attachment.bin\u003e\n-------------- next part --------------\nA non-text attachment was scrubbed...\nName: signature.asc\nType: application/pgp-signature\nSize: 801 bytes\nDesc: OpenPGP digital signature\nURL: \u003chttp://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/attachments/20151023/bcaecfa8/attachment.sig\u003e",
"sig": "25b56f18755c0cc1a65b88bfbf3f980c205e16d5fe79c2301dd06b031d0110b73c2195c762c022b4ebbe24d414198aff9e4e2fcca879c7d6c37d0657076d201c"
}