📅 Original date posted:2017-03-29
📝 Original message:> On 29 Mar 2017, at 04:50, Tom Zander <tomz at freedommail.ch <mailto:tomz at freedommail.ch>> wrote:
>
> On Tuesday, 28 March 2017 19:34:23 CEST Johnson Lau via bitcoin-dev wrote:
>> So if we really want to get prepared for a potential HF with unknown
>> parameters,
>
> That was not suggested.
>
> Maybe you can comment on the very specific suggestion instead?
>
> --
> Tom Zander
> Blog: https://zander.github.io <https://zander.github.io/>;
> Vlog: https://vimeo.com/channels/tomscryptochannel <https://vimeo.com/channels/tomscryptochannel>;
Just take something like FlexTran as example. How you could get prepared for that without first finalising the spec?
Or changing the block interval from 10 minutes to some other value?
Also, fixing the sighash bug for legacy scripts?
There are many other ideas that require a HF:
https://en.bitcoin.it/wiki/User:Gmaxwell/alt_ideas <https://en.bitcoin.it/wiki/User:Gmaxwell/alt_ideas>;
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/attachments/20170329/9f5a04ec/attachment.html>;
Johnson Lau [ARCHIVE] /
npub1fy…p2mv9
2023-06-07 19:58:04
in reply to nevent1q…lw5u
Author Public Key
npub1fyh6gqhg8zgyhhywkty047s64z2a7fjr307enrr3kqwtnk64plmsup2mv9Published at
2023-06-07 19:58:04Event JSON
{
"id": "fef0dfb839ac94f4c550bd31a6d28d83e766960d3d1c41b8c87d14679cdadc3c",
"pubkey": "492fa402e838904bdc8eb2c8fafa1aa895df26438bfd998c71b01cb9db550ff7",
"created_at": 1686160684,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [
[
"e",
"f66fb8ea0b053d3b896ce377aea38775ffc7975376c3ee96291861cf920b456b",
"",
"root"
],
[
"e",
"8027643cad9bdc11c83fd97c65db98f40f3a1803d35e88e6dde744de807265e0",
"",
"reply"
],
[
"p",
"dcb947d818dbfd7cf0baf26c0d5eb606b5a32336c5483fb53e05146315833ca7"
]
],
"content": "📅 Original date posted:2017-03-29\n📝 Original message:\u003e On 29 Mar 2017, at 04:50, Tom Zander \u003ctomz at freedommail.ch \u003cmailto:tomz at freedommail.ch\u003e\u003e wrote:\n\u003e \n\u003e On Tuesday, 28 March 2017 19:34:23 CEST Johnson Lau via bitcoin-dev wrote:\n\u003e\u003e So if we really want to get prepared for a potential HF with unknown\n\u003e\u003e parameters,\n\u003e \n\u003e That was not suggested.\n\u003e \n\u003e Maybe you can comment on the very specific suggestion instead?\n\u003e \n\u003e -- \n\u003e Tom Zander\n\u003e Blog: https://zander.github.io \u003chttps://zander.github.io/\u003e\n\u003e Vlog: https://vimeo.com/channels/tomscryptochannel \u003chttps://vimeo.com/channels/tomscryptochannel\u003e\n\nJust take something like FlexTran as example. How you could get prepared for that without first finalising the spec?\n\nOr changing the block interval from 10 minutes to some other value?\n\nAlso, fixing the sighash bug for legacy scripts?\n\nThere are many other ideas that require a HF:\nhttps://en.bitcoin.it/wiki/User:Gmaxwell/alt_ideas \u003chttps://en.bitcoin.it/wiki/User:Gmaxwell/alt_ideas\u003e\n-------------- next part --------------\nAn HTML attachment was scrubbed...\nURL: \u003chttp://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/attachments/20170329/9f5a04ec/attachment.html\u003e",
"sig": "9e66aad2c67c89feb608674059f48b5c73e5f024e90b13d5de427bd06c0617c9f2776c13337e1951cddfa82a0e3bada0991318083cbbb4658aba1016ea265aff"
}