📅 Original date posted:2015-03-11
📝 Original message:Understood... perhaps just add something like:
'After copy-editing and acceptance,* a BIP number is assigned* and it will
be published here.'?
https://en.bitcoin.it/wiki/Bitcoin_Improvement_Proposals
p.
On Thu, Mar 12, 2015 at 7:34 AM, Gregory Maxwell <gmaxwell at gmail.com> wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 11, 2015 at 11:24 PM, Pindar Wong <pindar.wong at gmail.com>
> wrote:
> > Perhaps at some point consider introducing something akin to a
> > 'Bitcoin-Draft' (BD) status with some autoexpiry period?
> >
> > I understand that the Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF) has the
> > concept of 'Internet Drafts" (ID) and this looks like it has worked for
> them
> > so far.
>
> Thats more or less what posting to the list is supposed to be.
> Creating a draft document requires no approval, beyond filling out the
> right form.
>
> Perhaps calling out that as a distinct step would be better, indeed.
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/attachments/20150312/35027fd0/attachment.html>;
Pindar Wong [ARCHIVE] /
npub1gg…t7uvk
2023-06-07 17:31:47
in reply to nevent1q…ajxv
Author Public Key
npub1gg0pysd236d4em7pts906ev9kf6f30j8werd40j2vwpes7fqdn4qtt7uvkPublished at
2023-06-07 17:31:47Event JSON
{
"id": "f6af973f062b43dea4021728a051e7110aac1ab7ce91d3f5fea99f73e677a93f",
"pubkey": "421e1241aa8e9b5cefc15c0afd6585b27498be477646dabe4a63839879206cea",
"created_at": 1686151907,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [
[
"e",
"866c875968beeacd0190d68043a5a479826cdbf734aec7e1e17ac288f87f694d",
"",
"root"
],
[
"e",
"957ba95138669cc3c67be0e39db3372bbba86e69ce9037035c3887a986251fa3",
"",
"reply"
],
[
"p",
"4aa6cf9aa5c8e98f401dac603c6a10207509b6a07317676e9d6615f3d7103d73"
]
],
"content": "📅 Original date posted:2015-03-11\n📝 Original message:Understood... perhaps just add something like:\n\n'After copy-editing and acceptance,* a BIP number is assigned* and it will\nbe published here.'?\n\nhttps://en.bitcoin.it/wiki/Bitcoin_Improvement_Proposals\n\np.\n\n\nOn Thu, Mar 12, 2015 at 7:34 AM, Gregory Maxwell \u003cgmaxwell at gmail.com\u003e wrote:\n\n\u003e On Wed, Mar 11, 2015 at 11:24 PM, Pindar Wong \u003cpindar.wong at gmail.com\u003e\n\u003e wrote:\n\u003e \u003e Perhaps at some point consider introducing something akin to a\n\u003e \u003e 'Bitcoin-Draft' (BD) status with some autoexpiry period?\n\u003e \u003e\n\u003e \u003e I understand that the Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF) has the\n\u003e \u003e concept of 'Internet Drafts\" (ID) and this looks like it has worked for\n\u003e them\n\u003e \u003e so far.\n\u003e\n\u003e Thats more or less what posting to the list is supposed to be.\n\u003e Creating a draft document requires no approval, beyond filling out the\n\u003e right form.\n\u003e\n\u003e Perhaps calling out that as a distinct step would be better, indeed.\n\u003e\n-------------- next part --------------\nAn HTML attachment was scrubbed...\nURL: \u003chttp://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/attachments/20150312/35027fd0/attachment.html\u003e",
"sig": "9539ff5d71709d3fd802c34885cc9ab06ecb60ddc4a452e7893079f3ea9441c62733834900b3d996a6e533fd42c64b51a5ca3e98ea331795a8997b279900a333"
}