I doubt the network would haven taken off with that economic model, but yes the beneficiary of the service paying for the service is a viable model.
Unless I’m missing something Nostr seems to have that model completely reversed.
matteopellegrini / Matteo Pellegrini
npub1we…jwqzn
2023-05-02 18:20:42
in reply to nevent1q…yxuk
Author Public Key
npub1wej5x7m85ush2wapzwp2dj3map5gpgkjw4dn7fkcg5dwkvr5yg0sejwqznPublished at
2023-05-02 18:20:42Event JSON
{
"id": "f93b97f7eda2f8a7093f6338205560d0d8d38736cc0c531d14ab8d8ff3000822",
"pubkey": "7665437b67a721753ba11382a6ca3be86880a2d2755b3f26d8451aeb3074221f",
"created_at": 1683044442,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [
[
"e",
"f6e709a7547e30bdbdca7d991d2034aef5bf2007aadfae09dbc333443dc68151",
"wss://relay.damus.io/"
],
[
"e",
"ee32203402239ca55137a3d395cf5437693fe0401698227180549f7d2c180e80"
],
[
"p",
"3bf0c63fcb93463407af97a5e5ee64fa883d107ef9e558472c4eb9aaaefa459d"
],
[
"p",
"3bf0c63fcb93463407af97a5e5ee64fa883d107ef9e558472c4eb9aaaefa459d"
]
],
"content": "I doubt the network would haven taken off with that economic model, but yes the beneficiary of the service paying for the service is a viable model. \n\nUnless I’m missing something Nostr seems to have that model completely reversed. ",
"sig": "b5417216f16e15d670f013d67bcbbb474b30dadbcbdef17c1f5b9ef5344992d4e8dbec3f336c72dff7f1ae71af06902ddd94bc4fb4d4d5dc90251ef0a9844645"
}