真好笑，嚎叫着边缘群体为歧视发声“威胁了我们的言论自由”的人，和提议将会事实上干涉言论自由的严刑峻法的人是同一群，而且他们正在不成比例地打压边缘群体的发言权。
从来都是“谁能说话”的问题。
这也是为何总是有人强调“fedi上全是儿童色情内容”的原因，哪怕大多数fedi实例已经断开了与没有适当限制儿童色情内容的实例的连接。更何况，基本上所有商业社交网络也多少在限制儿童色情上失败了*。
这就是因为他们想把我们关在大公司控制的社交媒体里，于是那些有权有势的人可以决定我们能看到什么。
译者注：
*
Instagram:
https://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2023/06/damning-probes-find-instagram-is-key-link-connecting-pedophile-rings/
https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/how-bad-csam-issue-inside-instagram-surfacing-data-christofoletti
WhatsApp:
https://www.politico.eu/article/encryption-could-hinder-childrens-safety-brussels-warns-facebook/
Twitter/Elon Musk:
https://www.washingtonpost.com/technology/2023/07/27/twitter-csam-dom-lucre-elon-musk/
General:
https://www.nbcnews.com/tech/tech-news/child-sexual-abuse-images-online-exploitation-surge-during-pandemic-n1190506
原贴：
https://toot.lgbt/@FuchsiaShock/110830507831538319
RE: https://toot.lgbt/users/FuchsiaShock/statuses/110830540168246640
quotingThis is why there's been this narrative about CSAM specifically on fediverse, despite fediverse mostly defederating instances that don't properly moderate CSAM, and pretty much all corporate social networks failing to moderate CSAM in some way or other.
note1jvp…jz7r
Because they want to keep people on corporate-controlled social media where those with power decide what speech is acceptable.