> No. Prosecutors never know whether crimes have been committed.
Of course not. However, let’s say that #Trump says “I want #JoeBiden in jail, go find something” to the AG. something like that isn’t covered, because there’s no pursuit of the law in that case, you’re pursuing a person.
> Where in that screenshot (or elsewhere in the decision) do you think you see that kind of restriction? You don’t.
Maybe you don’t if you didn’t read it, but I found it and pointed it out here in case you forgot it:
https://noauthority.social/users/realcaseyrollins/statuses/112752214824759357
Notice how I said that it didn’t support your position, asked you how it does, and you still didn’t answer…seven hours and several angry replies later 😂
> Malicious prosecution is prosecution where the evidence is weaker than it ordinarily would be to prosecute, or perhaps even nonexistent, motivated for some purpose other than evenhanded enforcement of the law.
And see this is the weird thing, you can be spot on here, but then go off the rails in your other replies. It’s insane!
realcaseyrollins ✝️ /
npub19g…cx4p4
2024-07-09 03:56:42
in reply to nevent1q…rgdy
Author Public Key
npub19gvf2pju7j66w8t34gvhhyr0du708llt9u9ns0605xy8vhs2a22qlcx4p4Published at
2024-07-09 03:56:42Event JSON
{
"id": "fb4ca85b16de4fe1bf35eea3f029f9516f3e1c7bea39b302704bfdf1a60cd8ad",
"pubkey": "2a1895065cf4b5a71d71aa197b906f6f3cf3ffeb2f0b383f4fa188765e0aea94",
"created_at": 1720490202,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [
[
"e",
"d49d4a51f29ddd7b7a6c0bf9b976c0cbbbd9b33c448eeebce6e23d39ae87196a",
"",
"root"
],
[
"t",
"trump"
],
[
"p",
"a856d220a92a9449ad661808e334bfb5e230e9d049c21572bb8a11f4fc951c37"
],
[
"t",
"joebiden"
],
[
"p",
"f3ac4d5a9430e81c43754953bcd4db9defe68e218bcf0db440faa7d6b70fb940"
],
[
"p",
"d47ea77b264de373fd40ed02e3a492f45df5f92d3415af78cbabc37283411acd"
],
[
"p",
"a47f0fbd67b7b88f76d06d544b0df5bbc600c938274b0ab6a59f6e19e8c9957e"
],
[
"p",
"e98bb6b76cd12e46e8bb4c9efba02c5133cde99904ef1507252fdeb6bb339dd9"
],
[
"p",
"2a1895065cf4b5a71d71aa197b906f6f3cf3ffeb2f0b383f4fa188765e0aea94"
],
[
"e",
"9a50622ca40e053e67231052c5f932578c5a40cecab32ed787d789eafb8c189e",
"",
"reply"
],
[
"proxy",
"https://social.teci.world/objects/34a6c3a7-8e66-49b1-bf64-affb8cf55b4e",
"activitypub"
],
[
"L",
"pink.momostr"
],
[
"l",
"pink.momostr.activitypub:https://social.teci.world/objects/34a6c3a7-8e66-49b1-bf64-affb8cf55b4e",
"pink.momostr"
],
[
"expiration",
"1723082202"
]
],
"content": "\u003e No. Prosecutors never know whether crimes have been committed.\n\nOf course not. However, let’s say that #Trump says “I want #JoeBiden in jail, go find something” to the AG. something like that isn’t covered, because there’s no pursuit of the law in that case, you’re pursuing a person.\n\n\u003e Where in that screenshot (or elsewhere in the decision) do you think you see that kind of restriction? You don’t.\n\nMaybe you don’t if you didn’t read it, but I found it and pointed it out here in case you forgot it: \n\nhttps://noauthority.social/users/realcaseyrollins/statuses/112752214824759357\n\nNotice how I said that it didn’t support your position, asked you how it does, and you still didn’t answer…seven hours and several angry replies later 😂 \n\n\u003e Malicious prosecution is prosecution where the evidence is weaker than it ordinarily would be to prosecute, or perhaps even nonexistent, motivated for some purpose other than evenhanded enforcement of the law.\n\nAnd see this is the weird thing, you can be spot on here, but then go off the rails in your other replies. It’s insane!",
"sig": "bbc8554a9442cd63374c2f7b825ceffd29fa1d1bc84023d9d119454dd40829bbfb8a2ca8aa877f9ad9af0d507b3555391edae9c5a863f4d0747326a7e0bb1431"
}