š
Original date posted:2017-11-02
š Original message:You launched the political football by coming here with a verbose
'recommendation'. Without a code submission in form of pull request to
the core repo on github this was never a technical discussion.
On Thu, 2017-11-02 at 19:53 -0400, Scott Roberts via bitcoin-dev wrote:
> Whatever their failings from their previous code or their adversarial
> nature, they got this code right and I'm only presenting it as a real
> and excellent solution for the impending threat to bitcoin. As a big
> core fan, I really wanted to delete the word Cash from my post because
> I was afraid someone would turn this technical discussion into a
> political football.
>
> On Nov 2, 2017 7:37 PM, "Gregory Maxwell" <greg at xiph.org> wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 2, 2017 at 11:31 PM, Scott Roberts via bitcoin-dev
> <bitcoin-dev at lists.linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
> > Bitcoin cash will hard fork on Nov 13 to implement a new
> difficulty
> > algorithm. Bitcoin itself might need to hard fork to employ
> a similar
> > algorithm. It's about as good as they come because it
> followed the
>
>
> This is the bitcoin development mailing list, not the "give
> free
> review to the obviously defective proposals of adversarial
> competing
> systems" mailing list. Your posting is off-topic.
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> bitcoin-dev mailing list
> bitcoin-dev at lists.linuxfoundation.org
> https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev
gb [ARCHIVE] /
npub1j0ā¦u0kje
2023-06-07 20:07:31
in reply to nevent1qā¦8n76
Author Public Key
npub1j0cee8lvw7v75c0vfsgfpt5xv8qmr3xzhlwpg9lestngmzwu0u9s6u0kjePublished at
2023-06-07 20:07:31Event JSON
{
"id": "fe4d23cc7fcac30ca1c98ab7779b3062e70724f6422729b7e44419b8e602cbce",
"pubkey": "93f19c9fec7799ea61ec4c1090ae8661c1b1c4c2bfdc1417f982e68d89dc7f0b",
"created_at": 1686161251,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [
[
"e",
"29b18a9d3d94ae2df261451d35caed6ab5ee6f2ab3fc3f1736759599c621ef12",
"",
"root"
],
[
"e",
"78d1fc74bd7e3b2575bedc7df757ecfc5d1613df42d5e9e81beb1a0b61cff495",
"",
"reply"
],
[
"p",
"d55b56945478e3c1238cfed8e6c32c8517e76894bc922f29d6ea42f74fca9b12"
]
],
"content": "š
Original date posted:2017-11-02\nš Original message:You launched the political football by coming here with a verbose\n'recommendation'. Without a code submission in form of pull request to\nthe core repo on github this was never a technical discussion.\n\nOn Thu, 2017-11-02 at 19:53 -0400, Scott Roberts via bitcoin-dev wrote:\n\u003e Whatever their failings from their previous code or their adversarial\n\u003e nature, they got this code right and I'm only presenting it as a real\n\u003e and excellent solution for the impending threat to bitcoin. As a big\n\u003e core fan, I really wanted to delete the word Cash from my post because\n\u003e I was afraid someone would turn this technical discussion into a\n\u003e political football.\n\u003e \n\u003e On Nov 2, 2017 7:37 PM, \"Gregory Maxwell\" \u003cgreg at xiph.org\u003e wrote:\n\u003e On Thu, Nov 2, 2017 at 11:31 PM, Scott Roberts via bitcoin-dev\n\u003e \u003cbitcoin-dev at lists.linuxfoundation.org\u003e wrote:\n\u003e \u003e Bitcoin cash will hard fork on Nov 13 to implement a new\n\u003e difficulty\n\u003e \u003e algorithm. Bitcoin itself might need to hard fork to employ\n\u003e a similar\n\u003e \u003e algorithm. It's about as good as they come because it\n\u003e followed the\n\u003e \n\u003e \n\u003e This is the bitcoin development mailing list, not the \"give\n\u003e free\n\u003e review to the obviously defective proposals of adversarial\n\u003e competing\n\u003e systems\" mailing list. Your posting is off-topic.\n\u003e \n\u003e \n\u003e \n\u003e \n\u003e _______________________________________________\n\u003e bitcoin-dev mailing list\n\u003e bitcoin-dev at lists.linuxfoundation.org\n\u003e https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev",
"sig": "ef685dc4e5fb64e5ccd2bc928beaee0389f2e69fc9f84b672a843d1350a3a5f0b1e3f804ec0ad9c0b09cc6b32591bbbebe0b51af08643899cc1ecbef32572689"
}