Wladimir J. van der Laan [ARCHIVE] on Nostr: 📅 Original date posted:2015-08-24 📝 Original message:On Mon, Aug 24, 2015 at ...

📅 Original date posted:2015-08-24
📝 Original message:On Mon, Aug 24, 2015 at 05:37:51PM +0000, Matt Corallo wrote:
> Its more of a statement of "in the future, we expect things to happen
> which would make this an interesting thing to do, so we state here that
> it is not against spec to do so". Could reword it as "NODE_BLOOM is
> distinct from NODE_NETWORK, and it is legal to advertise NODE_BLOOM but
> not NODE_NETWORK (though there is little reason to do so now, some
> proposals may make this more useful in the future)"?

Yes, it makes sense to not explicitly exclude it.
Looks good to me.

Wladimir