> If you want to change the NIP-01 spec, let's go ahead and change it.
what change am I proposing exactly? I'm just trying to clarify how things work and you're accusing me of..... what, exactly? some secret backdoor deal where I'm changing NIP-01?
like you quoted from NIP-01, the "d" tag significance on 30000<=x<40000 is specified, the default "" is how relays handle misbehaving clients -- this is not some spec I am writing, I was just describing how __things other people have implemented__ work.
I'm going to remove myself from this thread seems it feels incredibly aggressive gratuitously.