📅 Original date posted:2015-10-06
📝 Original message:Hi Byron,
I've been using shadow a bit-- I think these simulators are important for testing, but Shadow, at least, certainly seems to have limitations, in some crucial respects. Running shadow w Tor (which is only logical, because many BCT transactions transpire over Tor) is not as 'light' as presented and slows my own box down quite a bit, so the stats can't possibly be accurate... I don't know if this answers any questions or if you've had this experience at all -- perhaps it is negligible on a more powerful machine than my own-- or perhaps there is an adjustment still unaccounted?
Regards,
Nina K
Sent from my iPhone
> On Oct 4, 2015, at 2:04 PM, Byron Gibson via bitcoin-dev <bitcoin-dev at lists.linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
>
> Hi all, is anyone using simulators like Shadow (https://shadow.github.io), BTCSim (https://github.com/btcsuite/btcsim), etc. to test proposed changes to Bitcoin? I have a few questions about their capabilities and limitations.
>
> Byron Gibson
> http://mirror.co/
> https://keybase.io/byrongibson
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> bitcoin-dev mailing list
> bitcoin-dev at lists.linuxfoundation.org
> https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/attachments/20151006/0526cce0/attachment.html>;
naama.kates at gmail.com [ARCHIVE] /
npub1z3…s35aw
2023-06-07 19:42:34
in reply to nevent1q…lmdj
Author Public Key
npub1z3pv699thu72ewq38lny6cj5dx0xq6ft6mwlckjfus5qta4rx0gs7s35awPublished at
2023-06-07 19:42:34Event JSON
{
"id": "ae992f051a9d2d334b60c7214910a136582fe3aff0270651699fb76fd6ec6080",
"pubkey": "1442cd14abbf3cacb8113fe64d6254699e60692bd6ddfc5a49e42805f6a333d1",
"created_at": 1686159754,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [
[
"e",
"46685dfecea7d3bea3ed8b20a49d73cdee745c0e0491cb93d65880f0eaabd40e",
"",
"root"
],
[
"e",
"9655bd8d13eb3cc42e21921ceaacaed7be1c31ce89b265f5e9efa7f57bd76739",
"",
"reply"
],
[
"p",
"2d7ca1b5ea06bc89fd173bcf531cd3382e71910ae6e169dec65e50760a829e52"
]
],
"content": "📅 Original date posted:2015-10-06\n📝 Original message:Hi Byron, \n\nI've been using shadow a bit-- I think these simulators are important for testing, but Shadow, at least, certainly seems to have limitations, in some crucial respects. Running shadow w Tor (which is only logical, because many BCT transactions transpire over Tor) is not as 'light' as presented and slows my own box down quite a bit, so the stats can't possibly be accurate... I don't know if this answers any questions or if you've had this experience at all -- perhaps it is negligible on a more powerful machine than my own-- or perhaps there is an adjustment still unaccounted?\n\nRegards,\nNina K\n\nSent from my iPhone\n\n\u003e On Oct 4, 2015, at 2:04 PM, Byron Gibson via bitcoin-dev \u003cbitcoin-dev at lists.linuxfoundation.org\u003e wrote:\n\u003e \n\u003e Hi all, is anyone using simulators like Shadow (https://shadow.github.io), BTCSim (https://github.com/btcsuite/btcsim), etc. to test proposed changes to Bitcoin? I have a few questions about their capabilities and limitations.\n\u003e \n\u003e Byron Gibson\n\u003e http://mirror.co/\n\u003e https://keybase.io/byrongibson\n\u003e \n\u003e \n\u003e \n\u003e _______________________________________________\n\u003e bitcoin-dev mailing list\n\u003e bitcoin-dev at lists.linuxfoundation.org\n\u003e https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev\n-------------- next part --------------\nAn HTML attachment was scrubbed...\nURL: \u003chttp://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/attachments/20151006/0526cce0/attachment.html\u003e",
"sig": "2666e9b6c59dd6395256a90ec49c659e5f8b40b1e4c05e0f4fc40e00c34156d20649c5334591dd6ac9aacb93572b8f76c227cd613a3144325ca4a1521b146f6d"
}