Ludovic Courtès on Nostr: We’re (again) seeing the limitation of the vague “open” label, especially when ...
We’re (again) seeing the limitation of the vague “open” label, especially when applied to code and data without which it cannot function:
https://scholar.social/@dingemansemark/112838089680780055The four freedoms and the notion of “Complete Corresponding Source” remain a clear and unambiguous framework to determine whether software provides users with freedom and autonomy.
Published at
2024-07-24 16:27:02Event JSON
{
"id": "ae99d32593f085aaad18a18fc30815fb62a150810b47ace0da961533f4b86540",
"pubkey": "a2f3c64c54a02b513cdf0462dbbd46f37b07ab9e2b4c1edf49df645c511e7cdd",
"created_at": 1721831222,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [
[
"proxy",
"https://toot.aquilenet.fr/users/civodul/statuses/112841931000530223",
"activitypub"
]
],
"content": "We’re (again) seeing the limitation of the vague “open” label, especially when applied to code and data without which it cannot function:\nhttps://scholar.social/@dingemansemark/112838089680780055\n\nThe four freedoms and the notion of “Complete Corresponding Source” remain a clear and unambiguous framework to determine whether software provides users with freedom and autonomy.",
"sig": "96f6fdb5de5bfe3d2cdbd1bbb5ec0fe8eabdf250b9b52933e47ff5543c0bca69be0377a0d7d7aa5f1014dd751de00c8c505ee500ab7299d074dada92b8477e1c"
}
