📅 Original date posted:2014-05-03
📝 Original message:Think your example is not quite valid ...
People say or write $88M or $45k I.e. use SI prefix as a suffix, else it would be more, not less, clear on what amount is being referred to.
For me, "bits" are easy to say and one million as a factor is simple to understand.
M-bits, kilobits, millibits, etc are never going to be used by folk in everyday transactions, IMHO
Gavin
> On 3/05/2014, at 10:40 am, "Luke Dashjr" <luke at dashjr.org> wrote:
>
>> On Saturday, May 03, 2014 12:54:37 AM Ben Davenport wrote:
>> My only addition is that I think we should all stop trying to attach SI
>> prefixes to the currency unit. Name me another world currency that uses SI
>> prefixes. No one quotes amounts as 63 k$ or 3 M$. The accepted standard at
>> least in the US is <currency-symbol><amount><modifier>, i.e. $63k or $3M.
>> That may not be accepted form everywhere, but in any case it's an informal
>> format, not a formal one. The important point is there should be one base
>> unit that is not modified with SI prefixes. And I think the arguments are
>> strong for that unit being = 100 satoshi.
>
> Huh? Your examples demonstrate the *opposite* of your point. 'k' and 'M' *are*
> the SI prefixes. People *do* use 63k USD, $63k, and $3M. I'll be the first one
> to admit SI is terrible, but I don't understand your argument here.
>
> Luke
>
> P.S. Note that SI units haven't actually ever been adopted, except by force of
> law. "Name me ... that uses SI" is a silly thing to say, since virtually all
> naturally-or-freely-adopted units of any measure have been based on a number
> that factor to twos and threes (not fives, like decimal).
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> "Accelerate Dev Cycles with Automated Cross-Browser Testing - For FREE
> Instantly run your Selenium tests across 300+ browser/OS combos. Get
> unparalleled scalability from the best Selenium testing platform available.
> Simple to use. Nothing to install. Get started now for free."
> http://p.sf.net/sfu/SauceLabs
> _______________________________________________
> Bitcoin-development mailing list
> Bitcoin-development at lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development
Un Ix [ARCHIVE] /
npub1mx…45sm0
2023-06-07 17:20:48
in reply to nevent1q…mfc5
Author Public Key
npub1mxy8zdeg4txh8se7ugkrfhyfwxevsggcrce4ydmnkz6pn25jzwrqu45sm0Published at
2023-06-07 17:20:48Event JSON
{
"id": "abb5bea176cd378dd77c473d9046c34550be40702e37fccc367ac926e817648d",
"pubkey": "d988713728aacd73c33ee22c34dc8971b2c821181e33523773b0b419aa921386",
"created_at": 1686151248,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [
[
"e",
"8ba52f6cbd24b10aa5afc5a25b560c6e8e647707fdd12e939394a1e8c97861d5",
"",
"root"
],
[
"e",
"50373669c3d90f93232d72ef4568152e15e8e68d30d6db51c2f2fdb555ee8308",
"",
"reply"
],
[
"p",
"daa2fc676a25e3b5b45644540bcbd1e1168b111427cd0e3cf19c56194fb231aa"
]
],
"content": "📅 Original date posted:2014-05-03\n📝 Original message:Think your example is not quite valid ...\n\nPeople say or write $88M or $45k I.e. use SI prefix as a suffix, else it would be more, not less, clear on what amount is being referred to.\n\nFor me, \"bits\" are easy to say and one million as a factor is simple to understand.\n\nM-bits, kilobits, millibits, etc are never going to be used by folk in everyday transactions, IMHO \n\nGavin\n\n\u003e On 3/05/2014, at 10:40 am, \"Luke Dashjr\" \u003cluke at dashjr.org\u003e wrote:\n\u003e \n\u003e\u003e On Saturday, May 03, 2014 12:54:37 AM Ben Davenport wrote:\n\u003e\u003e My only addition is that I think we should all stop trying to attach SI\n\u003e\u003e prefixes to the currency unit. Name me another world currency that uses SI\n\u003e\u003e prefixes. No one quotes amounts as 63 k$ or 3 M$. The accepted standard at\n\u003e\u003e least in the US is \u003ccurrency-symbol\u003e\u003camount\u003e\u003cmodifier\u003e, i.e. $63k or $3M.\n\u003e\u003e That may not be accepted form everywhere, but in any case it's an informal\n\u003e\u003e format, not a formal one. The important point is there should be one base\n\u003e\u003e unit that is not modified with SI prefixes. And I think the arguments are\n\u003e\u003e strong for that unit being = 100 satoshi.\n\u003e \n\u003e Huh? Your examples demonstrate the *opposite* of your point. 'k' and 'M' *are* \n\u003e the SI prefixes. People *do* use 63k USD, $63k, and $3M. I'll be the first one \n\u003e to admit SI is terrible, but I don't understand your argument here.\n\u003e \n\u003e Luke\n\u003e \n\u003e P.S. Note that SI units haven't actually ever been adopted, except by force of \n\u003e law. \"Name me ... that uses SI\" is a silly thing to say, since virtually all \n\u003e naturally-or-freely-adopted units of any measure have been based on a number \n\u003e that factor to twos and threes (not fives, like decimal).\n\u003e \n\u003e ------------------------------------------------------------------------------\n\u003e \"Accelerate Dev Cycles with Automated Cross-Browser Testing - For FREE\n\u003e Instantly run your Selenium tests across 300+ browser/OS combos. Get \n\u003e unparalleled scalability from the best Selenium testing platform available.\n\u003e Simple to use. Nothing to install. Get started now for free.\"\n\u003e http://p.sf.net/sfu/SauceLabs\n\u003e _______________________________________________\n\u003e Bitcoin-development mailing list\n\u003e Bitcoin-development at lists.sourceforge.net\n\u003e https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development",
"sig": "a2c92e5fb92089c0d7c52dd58155991d6e62b7c2c2b465b18a33b21aac96f65091fe5e257367e6ab0b99a580928e6d8120c9235325033c216528ab3f7b174ad2"
}