📅 Original date posted:2015-08-21
📝 Original message:On Fri, Aug 21, 2015 at 02:01:06AM -0400, Jeff Garzik wrote:
> I don't see any link to data backing up "Bloom filter usage has declined
> significantly"
>
> Is there actual data showing this feature's use is declining or
> non-existent?
I run a number of high speed nodes and while I don't have historical
logs handy over time, I've noticed a drop from about %5-%10 SPV clients
at any one time to closer to %1 (Matt: you have a few TB of logs saved
don't you?)
Also, as I mentioned, just look at the popularity of wallets such as
Mycelium that are not adopting bloom filters, but going with SPV
verification of block headers w/ lookup servers.
Anyway, look at the analogous implementation of NODE_GETUTXO's, which
helpfully has provided the infrastructure for wallets that need bloom
filters to find appropriate nodes to connect too - we certainely aren't
seeing any shortages of nodes for those wallets to use.
--
'peter'[:-1]@petertodd.org
00000000000000000402fe6fb9ad613c93e12bddfc6ec02a2bd92f002050594d
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 650 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/attachments/20150820/d339991b/attachment-0001.sig>;
Peter Todd [ARCHIVE] /
npub1m2…a2np2
2023-06-07 17:49:04
in reply to nevent1q…xdje
Author Public Key
npub1m230cem2yh3mtdzkg32qhj73uytgkyg5ylxsu083n3tpjnajxx4qqa2np2Published at
2023-06-07 17:49:04Event JSON
{
"id": "afe06c96e90f3f2e5664f47c25419f16b698182858b9903a4a52bc1b207824df",
"pubkey": "daa2fc676a25e3b5b45644540bcbd1e1168b111427cd0e3cf19c56194fb231aa",
"created_at": 1686152944,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [
[
"e",
"677b2789bd9260c9edc4dfff20558f27945c985e840da0da606941d73d12b50b",
"",
"root"
],
[
"e",
"04450a14bdb8c49b285d135c2f1c9b6d784da855ae506c567126cde332e45fc1",
"",
"reply"
],
[
"p",
"b25e10e25d470d9b215521b50da0dfe7a209bec7fedeb53860c3e180ffdc8c11"
]
],
"content": "📅 Original date posted:2015-08-21\n📝 Original message:On Fri, Aug 21, 2015 at 02:01:06AM -0400, Jeff Garzik wrote:\n\u003e I don't see any link to data backing up \"Bloom filter usage has declined\n\u003e significantly\"\n\u003e \n\u003e Is there actual data showing this feature's use is declining or\n\u003e non-existent?\n\nI run a number of high speed nodes and while I don't have historical\nlogs handy over time, I've noticed a drop from about %5-%10 SPV clients\nat any one time to closer to %1 (Matt: you have a few TB of logs saved\ndon't you?)\n\nAlso, as I mentioned, just look at the popularity of wallets such as\nMycelium that are not adopting bloom filters, but going with SPV\nverification of block headers w/ lookup servers.\n\nAnyway, look at the analogous implementation of NODE_GETUTXO's, which\nhelpfully has provided the infrastructure for wallets that need bloom\nfilters to find appropriate nodes to connect too - we certainely aren't\nseeing any shortages of nodes for those wallets to use.\n\n-- \n'peter'[:-1]@petertodd.org\n00000000000000000402fe6fb9ad613c93e12bddfc6ec02a2bd92f002050594d\n-------------- next part --------------\nA non-text attachment was scrubbed...\nName: signature.asc\nType: application/pgp-signature\nSize: 650 bytes\nDesc: Digital signature\nURL: \u003chttp://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/attachments/20150820/d339991b/attachment-0001.sig\u003e",
"sig": "1249dc0f1a8a3f0ffe10c37b523f57bc334771c6110ebc7ea43d27c47969918e7f0dfb1ad7314cb6cbe2166eb290a131101d12dc8b5598f4b00dc5855de24138"
}