📅 Original date posted:2018-01-23
📝 Original message:On Tue, Jan 23, 2018 at 10:19 PM, Rhavar via bitcoin-dev
<bitcoin-dev at lists.linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
> Interesting. I didn't think about this before, but it seems like bip125 is
> rather incentive incompatible right now? If we're assuming a competitive
> mempool, it really doesn't seem generally rational to accept a replacement
> transaction of a lower fee rate.
BIP125 replacement requires that the fee rate increases. The text of
the BIP document is written in a confusing way that doesn't make this
clear.
Gregory Maxwell [ARCHIVE] /
npub1f2…crwet
2023-06-07 20:09:58
in reply to nevent1q…jz3y
Author Public Key
npub1f2nvlx49er5c7sqa43src6ssyp6snd4qwvtkwm5avc2l84cs84esecrwetPublished at
2023-06-07 20:09:58Event JSON
{
"id": "a5ae86907355d4dc2d6211537f40f8026428d8970cc44f958a3d9334391a0e08",
"pubkey": "4aa6cf9aa5c8e98f401dac603c6a10207509b6a07317676e9d6615f3d7103d73",
"created_at": 1686161398,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [
[
"e",
"d590d99f0e59a3ab6f27c432eb817e5977c68b50eee604d754c0603c2eeb8762",
"",
"root"
],
[
"e",
"cf57f56706f9bf66fba7243bd906b4f7e8f9fbba0d393c45803ed99ae313ce67",
"",
"reply"
],
[
"p",
"0edd50f962d40f6d28430b426c163d97f61365f07c64af51b8de33261ddd108a"
]
],
"content": "📅 Original date posted:2018-01-23\n📝 Original message:On Tue, Jan 23, 2018 at 10:19 PM, Rhavar via bitcoin-dev\n\u003cbitcoin-dev at lists.linuxfoundation.org\u003e wrote:\n\u003e Interesting. I didn't think about this before, but it seems like bip125 is\n\u003e rather incentive incompatible right now? If we're assuming a competitive\n\u003e mempool, it really doesn't seem generally rational to accept a replacement\n\u003e transaction of a lower fee rate.\n\nBIP125 replacement requires that the fee rate increases. The text of\nthe BIP document is written in a confusing way that doesn't make this\nclear.",
"sig": "f0d006fcc50ef42eb4e9aa3bf3d253fd720550aec193d8a104a4f4132fcde318824e05ecf6b7b4146528f2b115af16ba7a5c77fdf2e35e05beb2108b18db636a"
}