It may not be possible to prove God's existence like one proves a scientific fact, but it is more rational to believe in God's existence since it is based on evidence. Here's the ontological argument:
God is defined as a maximally great being.
1. It is possible that a Maximally Great Being exists.
2. A Maximally Great Being exists in some possible world.
3. If a Maximally Great Being exists in some possible world, then it exists in every possible world.
4. If a Maximally Great Being exists in every possible world, then it exists in the actual world.
5. A Maximally Great Being exists in the actual world.
6. Therefore, a Maximally Great Being exists.
vestion / Vestion
npub1w6…z4wwu
2023-08-25 10:20:25
in reply to nevent1q…dmrw
Author Public Key
npub1w695k9y6pv0fa5fz4xsljpnk4w5zk83xcmm92zt4dhzdtfl7waqsdz4wwuPublished at
2023-08-25 10:20:25Event JSON
{
"id": "77c8ad383a59b94e2eb569207a7f66b547abf32be591310b16ff5c4cc84a360d",
"pubkey": "768b4b149a0b1e9ed122a9a1f90676aba82b1e26c6f65509756dc4d5a7fe7741",
"created_at": 1692951625,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [
[
"e",
"f75ff96a0eb52df6c9d1a611793ac0b940b137169d15d53869eacf5cdf3aafcb",
"",
"reply"
],
[
"p",
"0c2fdd55d3044035d1fadb1f68c092b9815d0e3d44fce68557f2743fb1b4c241"
]
],
"content": "It may not be possible to prove God's existence like one proves a scientific fact, but it is more rational to believe in God's existence since it is based on evidence. Here's the ontological argument:\nGod is defined as a maximally great being.\n\n1. It is possible that a Maximally Great Being exists.\n2. A Maximally Great Being exists in some possible world.\n3. If a Maximally Great Being exists in some possible world, then it exists in every possible world.\n4. If a Maximally Great Being exists in every possible world, then it exists in the actual world.\n5. A Maximally Great Being exists in the actual world.\n6. Therefore, a Maximally Great Being exists.",
"sig": "e1ae92415939c31d1c65038669bd744fe267d8cc48a740e7fcb2e8131bfd43870953ba798e8286f336808c5444a523272b167286f76ef7bc131817d9374ed113"
}