Only sticking to technical facts, But in that scenario the chain will 100% split with the 110 chain rejecting blocks that contain say an Op IF, etc. How would you respond if you’ve split off on a chain with say <5% of the current bitcoin hash? If you are rejecting the heaviest weight chain(the common definition for bitcoin) for a split chain with a comparatively tiny hash without replay protection, why aren’t you worried you’d lose funds? Without replay protection you can accidentally losing money unless you’re very careful about how a transaction is constructed and which chain(s) will accept it.
<5% would also currently be VERY generous as zero blocks have signaled support, e.g. all 110 supporters combined haven’t even mustered enough has power to produce a single block. Assuming support remains locked where it is today the 110 chain cannot produce blocks.
btconboard #LNHANCE or #CTV
npub15s…el6uv
2026-02-23 17:40:52 GMT
in reply to nevent1q…u4rt
Author Public Key
npub15ssy34l2ym5ux6n8khljvmzs3zp238d7xmhkq0xfceexxf5gdseqpel6uvPublished at
2026-02-23 17:40:52 GMTEvent JSON
{
"id": "7afc91e0a3a01a18abd28aed588837fcb90ac1b02f262090fdfd5e3b7e81c9ec",
"pubkey": "a42048d7ea26e9c36a67b5ff266c508882a89dbe36ef603cc9c6726326886c32",
"created_at": 1771868452,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [
[
"e",
"c60be47fe18b1e62580bc507f202309a4438b9730415329b53bac7e0fc91a89e",
"wss://relay.damus.io/",
"root",
"a42048d7ea26e9c36a67b5ff266c508882a89dbe36ef603cc9c6726326886c32"
],
[
"e",
"c3c4f6059ec94188d3989ae97a4f3292c32b343a3f0562a73aa8e0931b43346e",
"wss://multiplexer.huszonegy.world",
"reply"
],
[
"p",
"7cd5f5886be286fa7f85daa304049b06730deb8f13d35fbeff02116102454296",
"",
"mention"
]
],
"content": "Only sticking to technical facts, But in that scenario the chain will 100% split with the 110 chain rejecting blocks that contain say an Op IF, etc. How would you respond if you’ve split off on a chain with say \u003c5% of the current bitcoin hash? If you are rejecting the heaviest weight chain(the common definition for bitcoin) for a split chain with a comparatively tiny hash without replay protection, why aren’t you worried you’d lose funds? Without replay protection you can accidentally losing money unless you’re very careful about how a transaction is constructed and which chain(s) will accept it. \n\u003c5% would also currently be VERY generous as zero blocks have signaled support, e.g. all 110 supporters combined haven’t even mustered enough has power to produce a single block. Assuming support remains locked where it is today the 110 chain cannot produce blocks. ",
"sig": "18be4906acc4acad67bb497ea705a05812f5eeb8c75264ec77c4ed7fb75dda63676202643a413218f5f991985c94338a2dba3ac95839951719d22698b8290868"
}