📅 Original date posted:2015-09-16
📝 Original message:On Wed, Sep 16, 2015 at 9:54 PM, Jorge Timón <jtimon at jtimon.cc> wrote:
>
> On Sep 16, 2015 4:49 PM, "Tier Nolan via bitcoin-dev" <
> bitcoin-dev at lists.linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
> > At 75%, if someone sets the bit, then they should be creating valid
> blocks (under the rule).
>
> You shouldn't rely on that, some may start applying the restrictions in
> their own blocks at 0% and others only at 90%. Until it becomes a consensus
> rule it is just part of the standard policy (and we shouldn't rely on nodes
> following the standard policy).
>
It would be a consensus rule. If >75% of the blocks in the last 2016
window have the bit set, then reject all blocks that have the bit set and
fail to meet the rule.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/attachments/20150916/530b12d1/attachment.html>;
Tier Nolan [ARCHIVE] /
npub1g6…sl5wd
2023-06-07 19:40:06
in reply to nevent1q…dz26
Author Public Key
npub1g6vxlp4e0nyhs2dqxxcryztyf5f5hyuaq93nw4r87zcnv0sdsa0qqsl5wdPublished at
2023-06-07 19:40:06Event JSON
{
"id": "7ef7ef1e5c024cdf20a03cb2b87410646b7eb4a6d52fa7163cbf1a01467b1495",
"pubkey": "46986f86b97cc97829a031b03209644d134b939d0163375467f0b1363e0d875e",
"created_at": 1686159606,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [
[
"e",
"97970fd647e1ad99b763fefc14ff6c3da92992c59a8d85f2e5fe9ba87f5c9fb9",
"",
"root"
],
[
"e",
"99dadcacc34e8f0ffdcea19cf081015ee3d5e77eaa99bb28cec1c83b60e7704f",
"",
"reply"
],
[
"p",
"498a711971f8a0194289aee037a4c481a99e731b5151724064973cc0e0b27c84"
]
],
"content": "📅 Original date posted:2015-09-16\n📝 Original message:On Wed, Sep 16, 2015 at 9:54 PM, Jorge Timón \u003cjtimon at jtimon.cc\u003e wrote:\n\n\u003e\n\u003e On Sep 16, 2015 4:49 PM, \"Tier Nolan via bitcoin-dev\" \u003c\n\u003e bitcoin-dev at lists.linuxfoundation.org\u003e wrote:\n\u003e \u003e At 75%, if someone sets the bit, then they should be creating valid\n\u003e blocks (under the rule).\n\u003e\n\u003e You shouldn't rely on that, some may start applying the restrictions in\n\u003e their own blocks at 0% and others only at 90%. Until it becomes a consensus\n\u003e rule it is just part of the standard policy (and we shouldn't rely on nodes\n\u003e following the standard policy).\n\u003e\n\nIt would be a consensus rule. If \u003e75% of the blocks in the last 2016\nwindow have the bit set, then reject all blocks that have the bit set and\nfail to meet the rule.\n-------------- next part --------------\nAn HTML attachment was scrubbed...\nURL: \u003chttp://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/attachments/20150916/530b12d1/attachment.html\u003e",
"sig": "922834bac2a081c96e4f3b7208c3c57b6b7820eed89d8c9197822a34ee020dc790f61ea1a1253f06d882fdf7ad7d31a87ae931231d0cd6c6830cef5472975b47"
}