📅 Original date posted:2013-05-21
📝 Original message:Indeed, that has been proposed but it's a dumb idea and I'm very sceptical
it will go anywhere. Certainly no decision was made. The arguments for it
are based on some quite faulty thinking about economics. Double spend
notifications have been proposed a long time ago, I believe Matt has
indicated some interest in implementing them and that is the right way to
go.
On 20 May 2013 18:57, "Pieter Wuille" <pieter.wuille at gmail.com> wrote:
> On Tue, May 21, 2013 at 3:24 AM, Robert Backhaus <robbak at robbak.com>
> wrote:
> > So the decision has been made to make 0-conf double spends trivial, so no
> > one will ever trust 0-confs. If a later transaction appears with a larger
> > fee, it will be considered to be the valid one, and the first one
> dropped,
> > as long as the first one has not been confirmed. This makes undoing a
> > mistaken transaction possible.
>
> This has been suggested, but I know of no such decision having been made.
>
> --
> Pieter
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Try New Relic Now & We'll Send You this Cool Shirt
> New Relic is the only SaaS-based application performance monitoring service
> that delivers powerful full stack analytics. Optimize and monitor your
> browser, app, & servers with just a few lines of code. Try New Relic
> and get this awesome Nerd Life shirt! http://p.sf.net/sfu/newrelic_d2d_may
> _______________________________________________
> Bitcoin-development mailing list
> Bitcoin-development at lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/attachments/20130520/6d1de076/attachment.html>;
Mike Hearn [ARCHIVE] /
npub17t…4qgyd
2023-06-07 17:02:17
in reply to nevent1q…rvpv
Author Public Key
npub17ty4mumkv43w8wtt0xsz2jypck0gvw0j8xrcg6tpea25z2nh7meqf4qgydSeen on
wss://relay.noswhere.comPublished at
2023-06-07 17:02:17Event JSON
{
"id": "79164e0daea312daef3753040bdc24c7600f85a61bcebbeb9db7f7e9db71eb01",
"pubkey": "f2c95df3766562e3b96b79a0254881c59e8639f23987846961cf55412a77f6f2",
"created_at": 1686150137,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [
[
"e",
"e2b0d4c9e9ef91bcdbcf2583000e9ebb8fa15ef27e8a01c38f0772dbda8190a9",
"",
"root"
],
[
"e",
"c1dbaec3fb0ec0161c013b88bd30c8ce647346cc9d014721433a0fea60d1d8f0",
"",
"reply"
],
[
"p",
"5cb21bf5d7f25a9d46879713cbd32433bbc10e40ef813a3c28fe7355f49854d6"
]
],
"content": "📅 Original date posted:2013-05-21\n📝 Original message:Indeed, that has been proposed but it's a dumb idea and I'm very sceptical\nit will go anywhere. Certainly no decision was made. The arguments for it\nare based on some quite faulty thinking about economics. Double spend\nnotifications have been proposed a long time ago, I believe Matt has\nindicated some interest in implementing them and that is the right way to\ngo.\nOn 20 May 2013 18:57, \"Pieter Wuille\" \u003cpieter.wuille at gmail.com\u003e wrote:\n\n\u003e On Tue, May 21, 2013 at 3:24 AM, Robert Backhaus \u003crobbak at robbak.com\u003e\n\u003e wrote:\n\u003e \u003e So the decision has been made to make 0-conf double spends trivial, so no\n\u003e \u003e one will ever trust 0-confs. If a later transaction appears with a larger\n\u003e \u003e fee, it will be considered to be the valid one, and the first one\n\u003e dropped,\n\u003e \u003e as long as the first one has not been confirmed. This makes undoing a\n\u003e \u003e mistaken transaction possible.\n\u003e\n\u003e This has been suggested, but I know of no such decision having been made.\n\u003e\n\u003e --\n\u003e Pieter\n\u003e\n\u003e\n\u003e ------------------------------------------------------------------------------\n\u003e Try New Relic Now \u0026 We'll Send You this Cool Shirt\n\u003e New Relic is the only SaaS-based application performance monitoring service\n\u003e that delivers powerful full stack analytics. Optimize and monitor your\n\u003e browser, app, \u0026 servers with just a few lines of code. Try New Relic\n\u003e and get this awesome Nerd Life shirt! http://p.sf.net/sfu/newrelic_d2d_may\n\u003e _______________________________________________\n\u003e Bitcoin-development mailing list\n\u003e Bitcoin-development at lists.sourceforge.net\n\u003e https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development\n\u003e\n-------------- next part --------------\nAn HTML attachment was scrubbed...\nURL: \u003chttp://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/attachments/20130520/6d1de076/attachment.html\u003e",
"sig": "5f6d3f145c40489149fb6c7fcfd1a23b4d05f4a21414c79355b2828f60d00c2c3673fe433534be1b715d574f97604d90bb62fda005497b1c1f486f746e1959ba"
}