pkt on Nostr: https://petertodd.org/2024/one-shot-replace-by-fee-rate One-Shot Replace-By-Fee-Rate ...
https://petertodd.org/2024/one-shot-replace-by-fee-rate
One-Shot Replace-By-Fee-Rate
tl;dr: we can solve Rule #3 transaction pinning attacks by simply replacing based on fee-rate, if the old transaction wasn't going to be mined in the next block or two, and the new transaction will be.
This _is_ incentive compatible, because it makes more sense to make money now with a high fee rate transaction than to favor a transaction of lower fee rate that may never even be mined.
I'm thinking of releasing a simplified implementation of this in the Libre Relay fork I'm doing. I have at least one mining pool interested in running it. Will be interesting to see if people even bother attacking it.
One-Shot Replace-By-Fee-Rate
tl;dr: we can solve Rule #3 transaction pinning attacks by simply replacing based on fee-rate, if the old transaction wasn't going to be mined in the next block or two, and the new transaction will be.
This _is_ incentive compatible, because it makes more sense to make money now with a high fee rate transaction than to favor a transaction of lower fee rate that may never even be mined.
I'm thinking of releasing a simplified implementation of this in the Libre Relay fork I'm doing. I have at least one mining pool interested in running it. Will be interesting to see if people even bother attacking it.