quotingHilarious voting results on Twitter/X.
note1z2g…xd75
It is entirely possible that the platform attracts more of a centre-right audience or that the centre-right is more active.
Yet, the account of Brian Krassenstein has 844k followers and we may assume with some confidence that most of his followers are pro-democrat. If half of his followers had voted, Kamala might have won his poll.
I say *might* here because increased spread of the poll could also have brought more visibility to pro-Trump or pro-JFK jr votes.
This brings me to the formulation. Perhaps referring to Trump as a convicted felon is not the brilliant strategic move Brian thought it was. Maybe the formulation added a few extra thousand votes in favor of Trump. Why? Because the establishment in most Western countries have been against Trump for the past 8 years.
Yet another possibility is that Kamala Harris simply isn't very popular among people in general.
Anti-establishment has become attractive for a lot of people. This means climate *realism*, not climate alarmism, abandoning the UN Agenda 21 sustainability goals, reducing energy costs, energy taxes and costly regulations, avoiding WW3 escalations as well as furthering peace negotiations in Ukraine.
"The Establishment" has come to mean: net zero, ESG scores, DEI ideology, CBDCs, climate scare mongering, increased costs of energy and living expenses, moneyprinting via high degrees of government spending, abandonment of merit in favor of ideology, and so on, with carbon allowances and social credit scores on the establishment horizon.
While Trump is far from perfect, not every polititician has stood up in Davos and told the World Economic Forum to get lost with their socialist de-industrialization and anti-energy policies, calling them "Prophets of Doom".
Trump at Davos in 2020:
https://youtu.be/0UiFRZ3t_KM
Going back to 2017, Trump pulled the US out of the Paris climate accord. He said that it is designed to kill the US economy:
https://youtu.be/iI24uAdAYro
On January 20, 2021, Biden signed the US back into the Paris climate accord. This was done on his first day in office. Clearly a high priority issue even if perhaps mostly symbolic. It displayed allegiance to the UN Agenda 21.
2023. Trump critiquing Germany for its harmful climate alarmism policies:
https://youtu.be/sJSr4tFkjcA
2024, February:
"I will not allow the creation of a CBDC"
https://youtu.be/oUjMK8d6omo
It is possible that Trump became anti-establishment by pure chance, as his stance was to protect US energy sector and strengthen the American economy.
From there is was inescapable that Trump would end up in conflict with the UN Agenda 21 and its next milestone Agenda 2030. Probably without even knowing what they were.
His pro-energy stance was unacceptable to the Al Gore's of the world, including Bill and Hillary Clinton, Barack Obama, Elizabeth Warren, Justin Trudeau, Emmanuel Macron, Rishi Sunak, Angela Merkel as well as the deep state in the Scandinavian countries, all of which have heartily embraced the UN Agenda 21 and its authoritarian de-industrialization plans.
Clean, cheap and reliable energy runs the world and provides us with the benefits of civilization.
Being pro-energy has become anti-establishment.
#Trump #Agenda21 #Agenda2030 #Establishment #Energy #CBDC
halalmoney on Nostr: ‘ "The Establishment" has come to mean: net zero, ESG scores, DEI ideology, CBDCs, ...
‘ "The Establishment" has come to mean: net zero, ESG scores, DEI ideology, CBDCs, climate scare mongering, increased costs of energy and living expenses, moneyprinting via high degrees of government spending, abandonment of merit in favor of ideology, and so on, with carbon allowances and social credit scores on the establishment horizon. ‘