📅 Original date posted:2015-09-04
📝 Original message:On Friday, September 04, 2015 5:48:48 PM Justus Ranvier wrote:
> On 09/03/2015 07:06 PM, Luke Dashjr via bitcoin-dev wrote:
> > Since BIP 43 is still a draft, I propose modifying it to refer non-
> >
> > Bitcoin purpose codes to the SLIP repository:
> > https://doc.satoshilabs.com/slips/
>
> What benefit is created by delegating the BIP-43 namespace management to
> that company in particular?
Feel free to create a company-independent repository instead.
Although I don't think SLIPs are intended to be biased toward their company.
> BIP-43 as it is currently composed provides the convenient feature of
> purpose codes matching the BIP number. Moving purpose codes to a
> separate namespace add complexity to its usage for no discernible benefit.
This is not Bitcoin's problem... Polluting the BIP repository with N non-
Bitcoin related specifications would be.
Luke
Luke Dashjr [ARCHIVE] /
npub1tf…rfq0n
2023-06-07 19:39:32
in reply to nevent1q…2ru9
Author Public Key
npub1tfk373zg9dnmtvxnpnq7s2dkdgj37rwfj3yrwld7830qltmv8qps8rfq0nPublished at
2023-06-07 19:39:32Event JSON
{
"id": "5cb45bea64f0b1588a16107e7fd7dc1bd289d038128520a6c1f5a6e2c4805955",
"pubkey": "5a6d1f44482b67b5b0d30cc1e829b66a251f0dc99448377dbe3c5e0faf6c3803",
"created_at": 1686159572,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [
[
"e",
"966e36954c5a799d2ce857049ec2a4cef002ea864bd95e8a4e0f4504c64ac9b0",
"",
"root"
],
[
"e",
"d738b0f21acff7cd19648bc79f877ae1656ad5fc1b1b0352ac9fce6669b3f0d7",
"",
"reply"
],
[
"p",
"b2b39b6f2c86908d3da9f500193abd5757b21cac328f838800a48c4d557c10dd"
]
],
"content": "📅 Original date posted:2015-09-04\n📝 Original message:On Friday, September 04, 2015 5:48:48 PM Justus Ranvier wrote:\n\u003e On 09/03/2015 07:06 PM, Luke Dashjr via bitcoin-dev wrote:\n\u003e \u003e Since BIP 43 is still a draft, I propose modifying it to refer non-\n\u003e \u003e \n\u003e \u003e Bitcoin purpose codes to the SLIP repository:\n\u003e \u003e https://doc.satoshilabs.com/slips/\n\u003e \n\u003e What benefit is created by delegating the BIP-43 namespace management to\n\u003e that company in particular?\n\nFeel free to create a company-independent repository instead.\nAlthough I don't think SLIPs are intended to be biased toward their company.\n\n\u003e BIP-43 as it is currently composed provides the convenient feature of\n\u003e purpose codes matching the BIP number. Moving purpose codes to a\n\u003e separate namespace add complexity to its usage for no discernible benefit.\n\nThis is not Bitcoin's problem... Polluting the BIP repository with N non-\nBitcoin related specifications would be.\n\nLuke",
"sig": "e1b3107c9f53d6da008592db148d9e69a19f0696039343195964ed938f30fd3675ee8328ed94f4a5c0cd14cda5643749bcf076bac5b1ab17b0dd7d7167d82e56"
}