📅 Original date posted:2019-11-07
📝 Original message:
>
> > Isn't spam something that can also be addressed by using rate limits for
> > failures? If all relevant nodes on the network employ rate limits, they
> can
> > isolate the spammer and diminish their disruptive abilities.
>
> Sure, once the spammer has jammed up the network, he'll be stopped. So
> will everyone else. Conner had a proposal like this which didn't work,
> IIRC.
>
Do you have ref to this proposal?
Imagine the following setup: a network of nodes that trust each other (as
far as spam is concerned) applies a 100 htlc/sec rate limit to the channels
between themselves. Channels to untrusted nodes get a rate of only 1
htlc/sec. Assuming the spammer isn't a trusted node, they can only spam at
1 htlc/s and won't jam up the network?
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/lightning-dev/attachments/20191107/f34b9e63/attachment.html>;
Joost Jager [ARCHIVE] /
npub1as…wfqmx
2023-06-09 14:57:12
in reply to nevent1q…g0pj
Author Public Key
npub1aslmpzentw224n3s6yccru4dq2qdlx7rfudfnqevfck637cjt6esswfqmxPublished at
2023-06-09 14:57:12Event JSON
{
"id": "510642072f38a80159bb8ea520a5cf12d4d52121fa77365824027a3a4015bb79",
"pubkey": "ec3fb08b335b94aace30d13181f2ad0280df9bc34f1a99832c4e2da8fb125eb3",
"created_at": 1686315432,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [
[
"e",
"0c91e21e034533f122e94b0fd3031654ae905512e27a1262e64ae8c7923a76b8",
"",
"root"
],
[
"e",
"6fa15895de04247b630cac2d62133f95292a29280dc15974887ef79f6ffa4d78",
"",
"reply"
],
[
"p",
"13bd8c1c5e3b3508a07c92598647160b11ab0deef4c452098e223e443c1ca425"
]
],
"content": "📅 Original date posted:2019-11-07\n📝 Original message:\n\u003e\n\u003e \u003e Isn't spam something that can also be addressed by using rate limits for\n\u003e \u003e failures? If all relevant nodes on the network employ rate limits, they\n\u003e can\n\u003e \u003e isolate the spammer and diminish their disruptive abilities.\n\u003e\n\u003e Sure, once the spammer has jammed up the network, he'll be stopped. So\n\u003e will everyone else. Conner had a proposal like this which didn't work,\n\u003e IIRC.\n\u003e\n\nDo you have ref to this proposal?\n\nImagine the following setup: a network of nodes that trust each other (as\nfar as spam is concerned) applies a 100 htlc/sec rate limit to the channels\nbetween themselves. Channels to untrusted nodes get a rate of only 1\nhtlc/sec. Assuming the spammer isn't a trusted node, they can only spam at\n1 htlc/s and won't jam up the network?\n-------------- next part --------------\nAn HTML attachment was scrubbed...\nURL: \u003chttp://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/lightning-dev/attachments/20191107/f34b9e63/attachment.html\u003e",
"sig": "91057af5fa43121e25dccc50342b6f305e5f9ad15b38f4d7ca9123d6a9fb160e60ffb08abdfab3a6e030180d25d08a6af81cd0d8e0b5135e9a4268b2cda6c263"
}