📅 Original date posted:2015-02-26
📝 Original message:On 02/24/2015 11:41 AM, Mike Hearn wrote:
> Does this not also require the BT publication of the script for a P2SH
> address?
>
>
> You mean if the URI you're serving is like this?
>
> bitcoin:3aBcD........?bt=....
>
> Yes it would. I guess then, the server would indicate both the script,
> and the key within that script that it wanted to use. A bit more complex
> but would still work to save URI space.
What if the script doesn't use any key at all?
Somehow this "re-using" the fallback address idea feels less and less
appealing to me. I think we should add our own parameter and let go of
fallback addresses as soon as possible. If will waste space during the
transition period, but after that it should make no difference any more.
Andreas Schildbach [ARCHIVE] /
npub1xg…adsv7
2023-06-07 17:31:07
in reply to nevent1q…q8h8
Author Public Key
npub1xg2m84malu0cfm4444r0kysx4rgk27e75aj6sz6538kw8fcz627qeadsv7Published at
2023-06-07 17:31:07Event JSON
{
"id": "dc31c36586800a7484c2f7efc462da262e1c7c366fbeecb7c46efdd2936051a1",
"pubkey": "3215b3d77dff1f84eeb5ad46fb1206a8d1657b3ea765a80b5489ece3a702d2bc",
"created_at": 1686151867,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [
[
"e",
"dfefe04b212481eb3fe073238ab7d32774988526d8b8bf7f8fff0d7249ebe09f",
"",
"root"
],
[
"e",
"ecd05ddcfdb139f71a32e4ee093e3254f60d929a124d5e56b3db7b0901f6e1bf",
"",
"reply"
],
[
"p",
"f2c95df3766562e3b96b79a0254881c59e8639f23987846961cf55412a77f6f2"
]
],
"content": "📅 Original date posted:2015-02-26\n📝 Original message:On 02/24/2015 11:41 AM, Mike Hearn wrote:\n\u003e Does this not also require the BT publication of the script for a P2SH\n\u003e address?\n\u003e \n\u003e \n\u003e You mean if the URI you're serving is like this?\n\u003e \n\u003e bitcoin:3aBcD........?bt=....\n\u003e \n\u003e Yes it would. I guess then, the server would indicate both the script,\n\u003e and the key within that script that it wanted to use. A bit more complex\n\u003e but would still work to save URI space.\n\nWhat if the script doesn't use any key at all?\n\nSomehow this \"re-using\" the fallback address idea feels less and less\nappealing to me. I think we should add our own parameter and let go of\nfallback addresses as soon as possible. If will waste space during the\ntransition period, but after that it should make no difference any more.",
"sig": "c577e90297ae8f83bd4dd2453a2be6e422d0721ce1ca96774623e411cfbb2a2558bb9f00647c074a0ac1cf30ba36aa7fe6b12f6b2a6b281b9b3555eda930fbf0"
}