š
Original date posted:2019-06-27
š Original message:I haven't studied the new proposal in depth, but my first impression is:
Wouldn't it just be easier and better to just sign the entire "outputs" section of the PSBT?
The signature would cover every byte, and therefore would cover any
future BIP additions to the outputs area, and also help non-multisig
cases today.
---
Peter D. Gray || Founder, Coinkite || Twitter: @dochex || GPG: A3A31BAD 5A2A5B10
Peter D. Gray [ARCHIVE] /
npub10vā¦t058y
2023-06-07 20:18:48
in reply to nevent1qā¦5mpr
Author Public Key
npub10vqyu8x3f0lfttk98xc28ppuyufaz4df8x4aspa9w9xz5z05snzq7t058yPublished at
2023-06-07 20:18:48Event JSON
{
"id": "d6c0a19bd1df2e3ff5a91f4a9301ea0e5e114a033f5a8a3865c2a8ca1d0d930e",
"pubkey": "7b004e1cd14bfe95aec539b0a3843c2713d155a939abd807a5714c2a09f484c4",
"created_at": 1686161928,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [
[
"e",
"6dc430ad1a240d08cd6de3f78de0f3da923f2f5e843db09c88b3e0382b00b332",
"",
"root"
],
[
"e",
"78d7ddc45afee9df9f3ae3600682302bfa1970c2b2a81276e263045714ca3ee2",
"",
"reply"
],
[
"p",
"e999edd1a420e7d5e19be7870cbcfa798bb98cb408e5929a2a18181c8c6f1dee"
]
],
"content": "š
Original date posted:2019-06-27\nš Original message:I haven't studied the new proposal in depth, but my first impression is:\n\nWouldn't it just be easier and better to just sign the entire \"outputs\" section of the PSBT?\n\nThe signature would cover every byte, and therefore would cover any\nfuture BIP additions to the outputs area, and also help non-multisig\ncases today.\n\n---\nPeter D. Gray || Founder, Coinkite || Twitter: @dochex || GPG: A3A31BAD 5A2A5B10",
"sig": "da79cbd627575cf950e97499127f6e98221cd5a6c07f74950f8b3d24f1bf23b063b459c73ebf781f1bb3ab8ae28ca41008ae9e9a4ca7783e109ed8f53f8b67c3"
}