NunyaBidness on Nostr: On OP_CTV: If it gets in it “allows” collaborative custody but doesn’t ...
On OP_CTV:
If it gets in it “allows” collaborative custody but doesn’t “force”, correct?
If so then I don’t have to engage with it if I don’t want to.
If I don’t I’ll be labeled “elite” if I do then . . . why would I?
This isn’t like Segwit2x but I think it’s turning into a decisive issue again and I’m wondering if it’s at all worth it to get all shitty with each other.
Am I wrong?
Published at
2024-02-21 16:56:02Event JSON
{
"id": "de2065b56bd959fe9a75b67331378cfe1a7b99ae3135f5f18428c04243db944f",
"pubkey": "6389be6491e7b693e9f368ece88fcd145f07c068d2c1bbae4247b9b5ef439d32",
"created_at": 1708530962,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [],
"content": "On OP_CTV:\n\nIf it gets in it “allows” collaborative custody but doesn’t “force”, correct?\n\nIf so then I don’t have to engage with it if I don’t want to.\n\nIf I don’t I’ll be labeled “elite” if I do then . . . why would I?\n\nThis isn’t like Segwit2x but I think it’s turning into a decisive issue again and I’m wondering if it’s at all worth it to get all shitty with each other.\n\nAm I wrong?",
"sig": "2f4f91bd781babd704eff727e9d8b95350dfad5db0631f40b6fcd0657a5643d688275fe9cd0eb513bc8f1f31b604781e2e2306d16e2e1f5e0906e7e9fbec2ce8"
}
