š
Original date posted:2015-09-04
š Original message:On 09/03/2015 07:06 PM, Luke Dashjr via bitcoin-dev wrote:
> Since BIP 43 is still a draft, I propose modifying it to refer non-
> Bitcoin purpose codes to the SLIP repository:
> https://doc.satoshilabs.com/slips/
What benefit is created by delegating the BIP-43 namespace management to
that company in particular?
BIP-43 as it is currently composed provides the convenient feature of
purpose codes matching the BIP number. Moving purpose codes to a
separate namespace add complexity to its usage for no discernible benefit.
--
Justus Ranvier
Open Bitcoin Privacy Project
http://www.openbitcoinprivacyproject.org/
justus at openbitcoinprivacyproject.org
E7AD 8215 8497 3673 6D9E 61C4 2A5F DA70 EAD9 E623
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: 0xEAD9E623.asc
Type: application/pgp-keys
Size: 18381 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/attachments/20150904/ade4f0f3/attachment-0001.bin>;
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 801 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/attachments/20150904/ade4f0f3/attachment-0001.sig>;
Justus Ranvier [ARCHIVE] /
npub1k2ā¦9qd6m
2023-06-07 19:39:32
in reply to nevent1qā¦7df6
Author Public Key
npub1k2eekmevs6gg60df75qpjw4a2atmy89vx28c8zqq5jxy64tuzrws39qd6mPublished at
2023-06-07 19:39:32Event JSON
{
"id": "d738b0f21acff7cd19648bc79f877ae1656ad5fc1b1b0352ac9fce6669b3f0d7",
"pubkey": "b2b39b6f2c86908d3da9f500193abd5757b21cac328f838800a48c4d557c10dd",
"created_at": 1686159572,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [
[
"e",
"966e36954c5a799d2ce857049ec2a4cef002ea864bd95e8a4e0f4504c64ac9b0",
"",
"root"
],
[
"e",
"1b7b8baa31f5792202c1f67a6881988154a562ff45b9c375023c5f6170690d71",
"",
"reply"
],
[
"p",
"5a6d1f44482b67b5b0d30cc1e829b66a251f0dc99448377dbe3c5e0faf6c3803"
]
],
"content": "š
Original date posted:2015-09-04\nš Original message:On 09/03/2015 07:06 PM, Luke Dashjr via bitcoin-dev wrote:\n\u003e Since BIP 43 is still a draft, I propose modifying it to refer non-\n\u003e Bitcoin purpose codes to the SLIP repository:\n\u003e https://doc.satoshilabs.com/slips/\n\nWhat benefit is created by delegating the BIP-43 namespace management to\nthat company in particular?\n\nBIP-43 as it is currently composed provides the convenient feature of\npurpose codes matching the BIP number. Moving purpose codes to a\nseparate namespace add complexity to its usage for no discernible benefit.\n\n-- \nJustus Ranvier\nOpen Bitcoin Privacy Project\nhttp://www.openbitcoinprivacyproject.org/\njustus at openbitcoinprivacyproject.org\nE7AD 8215 8497 3673 6D9E 61C4 2A5F DA70 EAD9 E623\n-------------- next part --------------\nA non-text attachment was scrubbed...\nName: 0xEAD9E623.asc\nType: application/pgp-keys\nSize: 18381 bytes\nDesc: not available\nURL: \u003chttp://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/attachments/20150904/ade4f0f3/attachment-0001.bin\u003e\n-------------- next part --------------\nA non-text attachment was scrubbed...\nName: signature.asc\nType: application/pgp-signature\nSize: 801 bytes\nDesc: OpenPGP digital signature\nURL: \u003chttp://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/attachments/20150904/ade4f0f3/attachment-0001.sig\u003e",
"sig": "cee20dde46dac3792a86174f443e28c432a08af33b82a111041c107b4d3619af6a95f74fd9205c1ebf537228e11ccd1d1e3e5605c666364d89c7cb1413f3b7e6"
}