📅 Original date posted:2014-12-16
📝 Original message:The output has to be burned otherwise there is no cost of expressing
any number of alternate opinions the same time.
Tamas Blummer
Bits of Proof
On Dec 15, 2014, at 3:55 PM, Isidor Zeuner <cryptocurrencies at quidecco.de> wrote:
> For every participant who could try to decide about the adequateness
> of the cost, no direct effect comes from the difference between Proof
> of Burn, and approaches which keep the Bitcoins inside the set of
> outputs that can still participate. So, any notion which
> differentiates with respect to this must make some assumption about
> what defines the interest of the Bitcoin nodes as a community.
>
> Best regards,
>
> Isidor
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/attachments/20141216/1d71ad5e/attachment.html>;
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 496 bytes
Desc: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
URL: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/attachments/20141216/1d71ad5e/attachment.sig>;
Tamas Blummer [ARCHIVE] /
npub1cc…ex8m8
2023-06-07 17:27:46
in reply to nevent1q…35ap
Author Public Key
npub1ccegg9n9lnx6huppxg43m95488yur7pfemkn3pz0agjws5ffvtts0ex8m8Published at
2023-06-07 17:27:46Event JSON
{
"id": "d333431b04d11f499c526af785401236d66773e16612ce98611a6be4a7c593fd",
"pubkey": "c632841665fccdabf021322b1d969539c9c1f829ceed38844fea24e8512962d7",
"created_at": 1686151666,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [
[
"e",
"5d621269893f2dbd63283c3fef2b564d88f9f6005bf2c1f19d78db6deffd407b",
"",
"root"
],
[
"e",
"2bfe664f3c115e0788983b6df885e3eb7de9ff27545e984bbf1a20c315a2359d",
"",
"reply"
],
[
"p",
"70950d9ef527ee56cd47d1cec909c3ddfa69de32fbea13cad10641ee6dc93e39"
]
],
"content": "📅 Original date posted:2014-12-16\n📝 Original message:The output has to be burned otherwise there is no cost of expressing\nany number of alternate opinions the same time. \n\nTamas Blummer\nBits of Proof\n\nOn Dec 15, 2014, at 3:55 PM, Isidor Zeuner \u003ccryptocurrencies at quidecco.de\u003e wrote:\n\u003e For every participant who could try to decide about the adequateness\n\u003e of the cost, no direct effect comes from the difference between Proof\n\u003e of Burn, and approaches which keep the Bitcoins inside the set of\n\u003e outputs that can still participate. So, any notion which\n\u003e differentiates with respect to this must make some assumption about\n\u003e what defines the interest of the Bitcoin nodes as a community.\n\u003e \n\u003e Best regards,\n\u003e \n\u003e Isidor\n\u003e \n\n-------------- next part --------------\nAn HTML attachment was scrubbed...\nURL: \u003chttp://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/attachments/20141216/1d71ad5e/attachment.html\u003e\n-------------- next part --------------\nA non-text attachment was scrubbed...\nName: signature.asc\nType: application/pgp-signature\nSize: 496 bytes\nDesc: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail\nURL: \u003chttp://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/attachments/20141216/1d71ad5e/attachment.sig\u003e",
"sig": "a43ec7b6e949b6ac6f07ce1d337b6b0846f5cdca5cfe6e7fcebf5965fb09175a8ae28e8b925d36f706d821e59e6bc3bf2f88cbb49e56172c1444f4dfc0e59dff"
}