📅 Original date posted:2015-02-22
📝 Original message:Jan, this is great stuff! Thanks for sharing your experiences.
I think the 4k payments requests issue must be solvable somehow. I had
no trouble transmitting that amount via NFC, although yes a bit of delay
was noticable.
About payment_url: Protobuf allows changing optional to repeated and yes
it's backwards compatible. Which is why I'm personally against parsing
two fields rather than just one.
> 2) @Andreas: Is the r, r1, r2 mechanism already implemented in Bitcoin Wallet?
No it isn't. It's implemented in bitcoinj though.
Andreas Schildbach [ARCHIVE] /
npub1xg…adsv7
2023-06-07 17:31:13
in reply to nevent1q…64em
Author Public Key
npub1xg2m84malu0cfm4444r0kysx4rgk27e75aj6sz6538kw8fcz627qeadsv7Published at
2023-06-07 17:31:13Event JSON
{
"id": "97fb8375c2416cbba8925f1dfda9d193b475603b7e5cd9d2faa854558bd3d4e3",
"pubkey": "3215b3d77dff1f84eeb5ad46fb1206a8d1657b3ea765a80b5489ece3a702d2bc",
"created_at": 1686151873,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [
[
"e",
"dfefe04b212481eb3fe073238ab7d32774988526d8b8bf7f8fff0d7249ebe09f",
"",
"root"
],
[
"e",
"018a2b3a13720bec252fac2faba562563581a9ca2e1b5562b2af3b0b78b4279f",
"",
"reply"
],
[
"p",
"3a24ce2145c5488aebfb0fc113e7d44234e9d3733afa45e2d880eb259c3eade3"
]
],
"content": "📅 Original date posted:2015-02-22\n📝 Original message:Jan, this is great stuff! Thanks for sharing your experiences.\n\nI think the 4k payments requests issue must be solvable somehow. I had\nno trouble transmitting that amount via NFC, although yes a bit of delay\nwas noticable.\n\nAbout payment_url: Protobuf allows changing optional to repeated and yes\nit's backwards compatible. Which is why I'm personally against parsing\ntwo fields rather than just one.\n\n\u003e 2) @Andreas: Is the r, r1, r2 mechanism already implemented in Bitcoin Wallet?\n\nNo it isn't. It's implemented in bitcoinj though.",
"sig": "4c9b17a25241742942296f6a023ef683c2794ef2bf97618753501427a17eaf7e13796eac3761e76bb78f82a87511bde1044692e96bcf2d39527d234101717f2a"
}