Can someone explain to me what is the equivalent in proof of stake of the link between block achieved through the chain of hashes (the winner hash will start with a number of zero having taken as inputs the previous hash + valid transactions) making it costly and difficult to rewrite history and the more in the past the more difficult
Is there anything similar in proof of stake? If not why would those even be called “blockchains”?
Many thanks this is a genuine question!
edouard
npub1d0…c5c5w
2023-11-05 10:36:47
Author Public Key
npub1d0usdfqjjl4zulexrkulx6t2898g6rwntmdlqduq9v9xjv79gzrsgc5c5wPublished at
2023-11-05 10:36:47Event JSON
{
"id": "9292dd9592e64f607d8f2e71d07f1371780c2e72112289e6219210ae193192f8",
"pubkey": "6bf906a41297ea2e7f261db9f3696a394e8d0dd35edbf037802b0a6933c54087",
"created_at": 1699177007,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [],
"content": "Can someone explain to me what is the equivalent in proof of stake of the link between block achieved through the chain of hashes (the winner hash will start with a number of zero having taken as inputs the previous hash + valid transactions) making it costly and difficult to rewrite history and the more in the past the more difficult\n\nIs there anything similar in proof of stake? If not why would those even be called “blockchains”?\n\nMany thanks this is a genuine question!",
"sig": "c3405a40967f3c586064ec79c2468844cf28c0fd67c6b2876e90c464e22d3af3518da0ec95e92c52bc44ccfb29298bf448a2fcd6f1a1bba925fc5b9d9418f68c"
}