Watching the Andrew Wilson v. Dave Smith debate on Libertarian vs. Christian Populism.
Its interesting, Dave came in and should have asked for a conversation.
Andrew Wilson is keeping with a "Libertine" perspective of Libertarianism. I'd never debate since I'd rather not conversate as adversaries.
AnCap is a LEGAL SYSTEM, not a MORAL SYSTEM. Self Ownership is not a Moral axiom, its a Legal Axiom.
Laws are necessary when living in a world of scarce resources, so we need Laws, but to equate legal with moral is absurd.
I'm a fan of both of them, they both forgot that Debates are not suppose to be to convince the opposing debater. This would have been better as a conversation.
Chrys
npub1u89…03ed
2024-06-08 03:48:37
Author Public Key
npub1u895rj0zlqu55rtfxdyh6cu6nsxhck9qqqyut3qe6gkf2xjtv8vqfy03edPublished at
2024-06-08 03:48:37Event JSON
{
"id": "96870496be207273235b68bb54d7a8215a900d5b3f0da12f5a4df94809b23af8",
"pubkey": "e1cb41c9e2f8394a0d6933497d639a9c0d7c58a00009c5c419d22c951a4b61d8",
"created_at": 1717811317,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [],
"content": "Watching the Andrew Wilson v. Dave Smith debate on Libertarian vs. Christian Populism.\n\nIts interesting, Dave came in and should have asked for a conversation.\n\nAndrew Wilson is keeping with a \"Libertine\" perspective of Libertarianism. I'd never debate since I'd rather not conversate as adversaries.\n\nAnCap is a LEGAL SYSTEM, not a MORAL SYSTEM. Self Ownership is not a Moral axiom, its a Legal Axiom.\n\nLaws are necessary when living in a world of scarce resources, so we need Laws, but to equate legal with moral is absurd.\n\nI'm a fan of both of them, they both forgot that Debates are not suppose to be to convince the opposing debater. This would have been better as a conversation.",
"sig": "f9a0cca1d5e202c8d377ed16ddf30188e6f522ac10f40b79db99d00ee13e8a7792eacca0318b2e4ef7bd16d09474e54a877b2830ed73d635934e295fe16a2e73"
}