📅 Original date posted:2015-12-13
📝 Original message:Jannes Faber via bitcoin-dev <bitcoin-dev at lists.linuxfoundation.org> writes:
> Segregated IBLT
>
> I was just wondering if it would make sense when we have SW to also make
> Segregated IBLT? Segregating transactions from signatures and then tune the
> parameters such that transactions have a slightly higher guarantee and save
> a bit of space on the signatures side.
It just falls out naturally. If the peer doesn't want the witnesses,
they don't get serialized into the IBLT.
Cheers,
Rusty.
Rusty Russell [ARCHIVE] /
npub1zw…hkhpx
2023-06-07 19:46:10
in reply to nevent1q…xz9m
Author Public Key
npub1zw7cc8z78v6s3grujfvcv3ckpvg6kr0w7nz9yzvwyglyg0qu5sjsqhkhpxPublished at
2023-06-07 19:46:10Event JSON
{
"id": "94c8a72ea56e9da51f1b760c92e698a17ada4aca2f6b3d49ce375524bcc092c5",
"pubkey": "13bd8c1c5e3b3508a07c92598647160b11ab0deef4c452098e223e443c1ca425",
"created_at": 1686159970,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [
[
"e",
"12a84dc161497f5ec3fbb3e9fb726708fb1bb0268a8834c07e1f631c1bbca295",
"",
"root"
],
[
"e",
"d83ee2796bef2115040cb6e9d87dfe9389f5cc59e0d42236842b2d2266f14a3c",
"",
"reply"
],
[
"p",
"f05699fae959fb582a8bd56a55b613bafd61c2c239a00bc5ea66faf0cb7a2aa8"
]
],
"content": "📅 Original date posted:2015-12-13\n📝 Original message:Jannes Faber via bitcoin-dev \u003cbitcoin-dev at lists.linuxfoundation.org\u003e writes:\n\u003e Segregated IBLT\n\u003e\n\u003e I was just wondering if it would make sense when we have SW to also make\n\u003e Segregated IBLT? Segregating transactions from signatures and then tune the\n\u003e parameters such that transactions have a slightly higher guarantee and save\n\u003e a bit of space on the signatures side.\n\nIt just falls out naturally. If the peer doesn't want the witnesses,\nthey don't get serialized into the IBLT.\n\nCheers,\nRusty.",
"sig": "86a11e3aa4014e5ee3e31d54f1d21d9a9750f81325de1bd70b24c16652b7cc0d8dc8c3da147bf784298f2423314d63bd1f5938915bddad50f5544f33b6e3c834"
}