ηΏ ζη³ (npub1x2vβ¦ar98)
> How is software that doesn't respect freedoms 1 and 3 not proprietary?
Being proprietary requires having a copyright holder for it (proprietor), so I'd say it can't legally be considered proprietary. It's definitely not free software either, though.
π
π
π
π
π
π
π
π
/
npub1u2β¦7ds5s
2024-04-01 15:17:43
in reply to nevent1qβ¦e34m
Author Public Key
npub1u20kkrhfhk3pspn4f9dk8w7qp295vrf28jevcm9l7958xs99h3asu7ds5sPublished at
2024-04-01 15:17:43Event JSON
{
"id": "9b8a016f801b076c5de35d46bdb1758170a5f2e08bb832a87c5bd1eb43e66514",
"pubkey": "e29f6b0ee9bda2180675495b63bbc00a8b460d2a3cb2cc6cbff1687340a5bc7b",
"created_at": 1711977463,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [
[
"p",
"329983a38fb4950fe392bd9aa268f5b455950ae29f8ed50399ed57d94ca0fa82",
"wss://relay.mostr.pub"
],
[
"e",
"c235142c7ec190aeb1760ec8b0edaeeacacaf69f8e38fec64fae13c9176ea7db",
"wss://relay.mostr.pub",
"reply"
],
[
"proxy",
"https://the.asbestos.cafe/objects/e6210885-0185-4a7d-8cf1-9d1f016b6b37",
"activitypub"
]
],
"content": "nostr:npub1x2vc8gu0kj2slcujhkd2y684k32e2zhzn78d2quea4tajn9ql2pqqjar98\n\n\u003e How is software that doesn't respect freedoms 1 and 3 not proprietary?\n\nBeing proprietary requires having a copyright holder for it (proprietor), so I'd say it can't legally be considered proprietary. It's definitely not free software either, though.",
"sig": "86f052d16e32fc6f11b1631a570c34709ecc797302528b5a6dbe61504f37e73106dc66beb6964a2f4b719d7b40413daa64f2ffb907f18d7b2c8e2b5077659954"
}