bloodymary on Nostr: Communism is basically the opposite of nazism. Communists lost their lives to save ...

Communism is basically the opposite of nazism. Communists lost their lives to save everyone of us from the Nazis.
Anyone with a bit of brain is communist. I also think that what you have in your mind is not capitalism. American have a poor education system. You go to school and answer questions with checkboxes. You are not well trained to think. You also are pretty much full of yourselves which doesn’t help. America is a declining imperialistic power where their people where tought some strange things about communism.
The system America is ruling is of course an hybrid system, but between socialism and capitalism. The union of this two brings what we have today: totalitarian America!
Make no mistake, socialism ain’t no communism.
Then the rationale is this:
We have been capitalists since the dawn of history, as people always tried to accumulate capital and they also did it by destroying other villages/towns/cities/countries. Of course gold plays a big role in violence, but the system helps it. Marx explained how this system is a cycle of accumulation of wealth in few hand during time of peace which leads to conflict and redistribution after wars. That is what capitalism is about. Is about disparity. Capitalism cannot create an equally distributed system. And the type of money you use in my opinion doesn’t change it much. People are greedy. Greedy people only want more money and that is the root of a good portion of stress in the system.
On the other hand, communism is a system based on equality, on equal opportunities. And it’s also a system that we never experimented. Each time someone tried some fascio nazi capitalist came and destroy everything.
It’s probably a thing about being realistic.
You guys want to have a yacht and bitches twerking on your dicks. I personally give a fuck about shit like that. I want me and my people, my family and friends to live well. That’s a thing of points of view.
You guys want to accumulate wealth and then say, if we want we can provide help to the people in need, but in fact this will never happen.
I personally dislike the way the state conducts welfare state policies. I think kinda like you guys do, that the free will of people shall direct the resources freely, but I think that we need to cooperate in that. We need groups (soviets) which democratically choose how to allocate help and resources. I think you guys think you are wealthy with some bits in a wallet. Wealth is something else. You fear communists will come and take what you have. But that’s is not what a communist wants!
Personally I don’t think seizing is a viable way to do things. I think people should be enough enlighten to realise by themselves the strong shall help the weak, not using them to become stronger. This is the way we can provide more equilibrium in the system, making it less hot. Financial disparity creates friction, it may create well being for a small amount of people, but it doesn’t take in account the over all structure.
I think that no one should be forced to participate in a system and that anyone shall be free to opt out at any moment. This is in my opinion freedom.
Probably it happens the same way round, I mean you guys have a dystopian way of defining communism, and relying in what you say I seem to do the same with the word capitalism.
That may be, I agree that what we have now is not a perfect capitalistic system, it’s an hybrid between socialism and capitalism, but it’s not communism.

So let’s say I agree that the word capitalism today is abused and that the etymology of the word may have change during the course of time, would you agree that you guys give the commie to a bunch o nationalists socialist democrats due to the transformation of the meaning of the word communism??