Why Nostr? What is Njump?
2023-06-07 20:09:36
in reply to

CryptAxe [ARCHIVE] on Nostr: 📅 Original date posted:2018-01-17 📝 Original message:Why wouldn't they just ...

📅 Original date posted:2018-01-17
📝 Original message:Why wouldn't they just test the frequency of words from the wordlist in
entirety?

On Jan 17, 2018 5:10 PM, "Weiwu Zhang via bitcoin-dev" <
bitcoin-dev at lists.linuxfoundation.org> wrote:

> 2018-01-09 19:20 GMT+08:00 Ronald van der Meer via bitcoin-dev
> <bitcoin-dev at lists.linuxfoundation.org>:
> > After reviewing some bitcoin improvement proposals, I noticed that one
> of the words that can be found on the BIP39 English wordlist is “satoshi”.
> > I suggest removing this word from the list so it’s less obvious that
> it’s a bitcoin seed when found by a malicious third party.
>
> If a malicious third party discovers a word list that look like a
> seed, they would try using it as Bitcoin seed first anyway, with or
> without finding the word 'satoshi' in it. The security threat is that
> a malicious third party may index what they found and test every
> occurrence of 'satoshi' for a lead to a seed.
>
> For example, a hard-disk recycling service would add this word to
> their salvage tools. Any successfully hacked gmail account will be
> 'satoshi' tested too.
>
> So I see this as a reasonable improvement:)
> _______________________________________________
> bitcoin-dev mailing list
> bitcoin-dev at lists.linuxfoundation.org
> https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/attachments/20180117/ae8bb6fa/attachment.html>;
Author Public Key
npub12p7jzesdg8kxdg8rujr20znnd868fgugczkwh4cyxwa6gnxj5sxsnjs309