Kevin's Bacon on Nostr: In some (not all) of his proofs, he takes the particular and magically makes it ...

In some (not all) of his proofs, he takes the particular and magically makes it universal. He sometimes appeals to collectives as if they have a property right in their own right that is of the same urgency/importance as individual rights (national borders, legality of war). And he recently has been making the claim that positive analysis of markets is not only generally inefficient and a less sound basis for economic science, but that it is categorically a waste of all the resources put into it. What of the people who would be more convinced by that research?? And what if there was a flaw in the accepted deductions or definitions of the preeminent rationalist school of economic thought? (human error is rampant in the sciences, especially in our highly politicized, propagandized environment - what makes Austrian economics and his own work guaranteed to be infallible? perhaps some redundancy is, especially if voluntarily funded and unbiased, useful after all)