I am not pro Drivechains but I think this situation is different from 2017 as Drivechain proponents are not proposing a hardfork like bcashers were, BIP300 is a soft-fork, this means indifferent nodes would see the Drivechain chain as valid wouldn't they? You'd have to get people who disagree to actively update via UASF that rejects drive chains and you end up with 2 soft forks fighting each other, where indifferent nodes(not updated) see both chains as valid, therefore they will follow the one with the longest PoW, this means if miners are pro Drivechain they win because the Drivechain chain will have the longest PoW, Correct?
Lorenzo / Lorenzo Rey
npub1fv…tu2sp
2023-09-02 18:43:05
in reply to nevent1q…quh6
Author Public Key
npub1fv2pdvnch4wg76l9v0erlkutjun5ntjz9tsqs78g65tdl2s3hg0s3tu2spPublished at
2023-09-02 18:43:05Event JSON
{
"id": "8e391328a417480855fcc4da54f7964ec1528725ea6b1ab00b99a01f28d6f5ed",
"pubkey": "4b1416b278bd5c8f6be563f23fdb8b972749ae422ae00878e8d516dfaa11ba1f",
"created_at": 1693672985,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [
[
"e",
"cbb856be5745ca2bd8d5585204271508cda0487278ca97875d15533e6453afaa",
"",
"reply"
],
[
"p",
"7b3f7803750746f455413a221f80965eecb69ef308f2ead1da89cc2c8912e968"
]
],
"content": "I am not pro Drivechains but I think this situation is different from 2017 as Drivechain proponents are not proposing a hardfork like bcashers were, BIP300 is a soft-fork, this means indifferent nodes would see the Drivechain chain as valid wouldn't they? You'd have to get people who disagree to actively update via UASF that rejects drive chains and you end up with 2 soft forks fighting each other, where indifferent nodes(not updated) see both chains as valid, therefore they will follow the one with the longest PoW, this means if miners are pro Drivechain they win because the Drivechain chain will have the longest PoW, Correct? \n\n",
"sig": "1e2ac18e8b3b99ea9534135986e71b364fba86cade40edab9f2bed2aaaba213ff1fb5816faa2375c0194a7467d4475612436213e26fe07dbf043857fd66f25b8"
}