I’m by no means trying to destroy the argument or being cynical, just thinking as the discussion moves along. This is all in good faith!
I don’t see a path to UBI without centralisation of resources and redistribution by a central authority. If force is deemed unacceptable, then it must rely on generous donations. If force is deemed acceptable, well…
Of course any group could decide to organise in such a centralised way and to voluntarily give up capital for the common good, but what about the next generation, or any free rider that wouldn’t want to contribute?
Anyway I can stop, I really don’t mean to harass you! My focus and priority is on voluntaryism and individual freedom, so I’m always curious to see what works and not in such a framework.