š
Original date posted:2015-07-22
š Original message:On Wed, Jul 22, 2015 at 10:32 PM, Sriram Karra <karra.etc at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On Tue, Jul 21, 2015 at 7:28 PM, Peter Todd via bitcoin-dev <
> bitcoin-dev at lists.linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
>
>
>> I personally *don't* think he's doing that, rather I believe he knows
>> full well it's a bad patch and is proposing it because he wants to push
>> discussion towards a solution. Often trolling the a audience with bad
>> patches is an effective way to motivate people to respond by writing
>> better ones; Jeff has told me he often does exactly that.
>>
>> I think in this case we shouldn't do anything, so short-circuiting that
>> process by pointing out what he's doing publicly makes sense.
>>
>
> Assuming that's what Jeff is doing, how does preventing better solutions
> from emerging 'make sense'?
>
Peter, sorry, scratch that.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/attachments/20150722/b36d6328/attachment.html>;
Sriram Karra [ARCHIVE] /
npub19xā¦jxfq5
2023-06-07 17:42:31
in reply to nevent1qā¦5tgn
Author Public Key
npub19xyna0ghqxhzzkgufu9gcu7cavnfdex7ce8g263wru7a6psw4hvsnjxfq5Published at
2023-06-07 17:42:31Event JSON
{
"id": "0561a45b5d86c1b83e061f9cd98a221ed5872102af55aa87f329243ffb5b47e6",
"pubkey": "29893ebd1701ae21591c4f0a8c73d8eb2696e4dec64e856a2e1f3ddd060eadd9",
"created_at": 1686152551,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [
[
"e",
"2e544b01cfe0620e95990efdfb39d6c5828a4b2f5866e5b209d567b2efd50207",
"",
"root"
],
[
"e",
"c15e40a31e747caa37e603a0dba91a9d8aaa6a2a4ed96478f2c0ab0da050990c",
"",
"reply"
],
[
"p",
"29893ebd1701ae21591c4f0a8c73d8eb2696e4dec64e856a2e1f3ddd060eadd9"
]
],
"content": "š
Original date posted:2015-07-22\nš Original message:On Wed, Jul 22, 2015 at 10:32 PM, Sriram Karra \u003ckarra.etc at gmail.com\u003e wrote:\n\n\u003e\n\u003e On Tue, Jul 21, 2015 at 7:28 PM, Peter Todd via bitcoin-dev \u003c\n\u003e bitcoin-dev at lists.linuxfoundation.org\u003e wrote:\n\u003e\n\u003e\n\u003e\u003e I personally *don't* think he's doing that, rather I believe he knows\n\u003e\u003e full well it's a bad patch and is proposing it because he wants to push\n\u003e\u003e discussion towards a solution. Often trolling the a audience with bad\n\u003e\u003e patches is an effective way to motivate people to respond by writing\n\u003e\u003e better ones; Jeff has told me he often does exactly that.\n\u003e\u003e\n\u003e\u003e I think in this case we shouldn't do anything, so short-circuiting that\n\u003e\u003e process by pointing out what he's doing publicly makes sense.\n\u003e\u003e\n\u003e\n\u003e Assuming that's what Jeff is doing, how does preventing better solutions\n\u003e from emerging 'make sense'?\n\u003e\n\nPeter, sorry, scratch that.\n-------------- next part --------------\nAn HTML attachment was scrubbed...\nURL: \u003chttp://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/attachments/20150722/b36d6328/attachment.html\u003e",
"sig": "82d754fe32008fcf186f3c1ffd5d62c9da236f9c17aa20e105ce990e2c7ba6ff58c398716250bf6c40b9cfa7adee903210206ee25adc033718f0a43d781fd9ca"
}