Super Testnet on Nostr: Seems like voltage could help fix this: create invoices signed by a fake "ephemeral ...
Seems like voltage could help fix this: create invoices signed by a fake "ephemeral node" and only include their own node as a route hint. The payments are *actually* going to the intended Mutiny user (who alone knows the preimage) but Pocket would *think* they are going to the ephemeral node. Does Pocket require a signature "proving" you own the destination node?
Published at
2024-03-26 11:36:08Event JSON
{
"id": "0a3a771e7b6c2c60887aa69eaddbbc46408b6ce60ab4bbb8346b015867b42124",
"pubkey": "2183e94758481d0f124fbd93c56ccaa45e7e545ceeb8d52848f98253f497b975",
"created_at": 1711449368,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [
[
"e",
"1d72292bb828fa536a08a45f3f445122d191df61d3595ac13373335dbdb2146b",
"",
"root"
],
[
"p",
"5be6446aa8a31c11b3b453bf8dafc9b346ff328d1fa11a0fa02a1e6461f6a9b1"
]
],
"content": "Seems like voltage could help fix this: create invoices signed by a fake \"ephemeral node\" and only include their own node as a route hint. The payments are *actually* going to the intended Mutiny user (who alone knows the preimage) but Pocket would *think* they are going to the ephemeral node. Does Pocket require a signature \"proving\" you own the destination node?",
"sig": "a78dbc850d68e557a5e8c172c3ef0f8744bf2d544649b1247243bdda782679c35e0252b21afb5268393b8c92c30cb720cfb8f7ea9551b93bd4b28ccf88da2061"
}
