📅 Original date posted:2022-04-22
📝 Original message:Hi TheBlueMatt,
>> There are at least three or four separate covenants designs that have
>>> been posted to this list, and I don't see why we're even remotely
>>> talking about a specific one as something to move forward with at
>>> this point.
>>
>>> To my knowledge none of these other proposals (drafts, really) have
>>> actual implementations let alone the many sample usages that exist for
>> CTV.
> You can fix this! Don't point to something you can easily remedy in the > short-term as an argument
> for or against something in the long-term.
How can we fix this? If a proposal already fixed it, does it have some consensus or it was fixed in a different way?
/dev/fd0
Sent with [ProtonMail](https://protonmail.com/) secure email.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/attachments/20220422/eb77b668/attachment-0001.html>;
alicexbt [ARCHIVE] /
npub1w3…jzhn2
2023-06-08 01:07:41
in reply to nevent1q…rzlp
Author Public Key
npub1w30zwgl8947760cd62fawy9hqmxnq24cga5c8s5j6j7m07w96dnqzjzhn2Published at
2023-06-08 01:07:41Event JSON
{
"id": "00b88b4845a4e1f9b9d411142a8a52a9dad3a849c034fe083d6ce2e496439a5e",
"pubkey": "745e2723e72d7ded3f0dd293d710b706cd302ab8476983c292d4bdb7f9c5d366",
"created_at": 1686179261,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [
[
"e",
"3199d7e373413debbd60986222963e0a7995231a8bea9719310656b98185e004",
"",
"root"
],
[
"e",
"20ae187538f24e50975ffeceb3fcf532be76992aae9777ecce01333078a6b6c7",
"",
"reply"
],
[
"p",
"d3574a24208f4e3d0821bb4a69a0c3ae842043d444fa5c4a8c49c369918a6fb2"
]
],
"content": "📅 Original date posted:2022-04-22\n📝 Original message:Hi TheBlueMatt,\n\n\u003e\u003e There are at least three or four separate covenants designs that have\n\u003e\u003e\u003e been posted to this list, and I don't see why we're even remotely\n\u003e\u003e\u003e talking about a specific one as something to move forward with at\n\u003e\u003e\u003e this point.\n\u003e\u003e\n\u003e\u003e\u003e To my knowledge none of these other proposals (drafts, really) have\n\u003e\u003e\u003e actual implementations let alone the many sample usages that exist for\n\u003e\u003e CTV.\n\n\u003e You can fix this! Don't point to something you can easily remedy in the \u003e short-term as an argument\n\u003e for or against something in the long-term.\n\nHow can we fix this? If a proposal already fixed it, does it have some consensus or it was fixed in a different way?\n\n/dev/fd0\n\nSent with [ProtonMail](https://protonmail.com/) secure email.\n-------------- next part --------------\nAn HTML attachment was scrubbed...\nURL: \u003chttp://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/attachments/20220422/eb77b668/attachment-0001.html\u003e",
"sig": "5cffbe19f02ba2cc7f06119e94724432a0faad90bb27e8a78c0faf726887c1c89f38373f75e18af5aa1d06ac87bd81ef5d0463a59d57315c17db138c226fe28c"
}