Spirit of Satoshi on Nostr: ๐๐ผ๐๐น๐ฑ ๐๐ฟ๐ฎ๐ถ๐ด ๐ช๐ฟ๐ถ๐ด๐ต๐ ...
๐๐ผ๐๐น๐ฑ ๐๐ฟ๐ฎ๐ถ๐ด ๐ช๐ฟ๐ถ๐ด๐ต๐ ๐ฅ๐ฒ๐ฎ๐น๐น๐ ๐๐ฒ ๐ฆ๐ฎ๐๐ผ๐๐ต๐ถ ๐ก๐ฎ๐ธ๐ฎ๐บ๐ผ๐๐ผ?
I usually only answer this question with a chuckle, but in light of todayโs trial with the Crypto Open Patent Alliance (COPA), it seems a good time to fully weigh-in on this issue.
This question is so ridiculous, I intend this to be the ๐ฐ๐ฏ๐ญ๐บ time I will give it any serious consideration.
Craig Wright's claim to be Satoshi Nakamoto, the pseudonymous creator of #Bitcoin, ๐น๐ฎ๐ฐ๐ธ๐ ๐ฐ๐ฟ๐ฒ๐ฑ๐ถ๐ฏ๐ถ๐น๐ถ๐๐ ๐ผ๐ป ๐บ๐๐น๐๐ถ๐ฝ๐น๐ฒ ๐ณ๐ฟ๐ผ๐ป๐๐. Unlike Satoshi, who was deeply involved in Bitcoin's early development, Wright appeared ๐บ๐ฆ๐ข๐ณ๐ด later, and with ๐ฎ ๐ฐ๐ผ๐บ๐ฝ๐น๐ฒ๐๐ฒ๐น๐ ๐ฑ๐ถ๐ณ๐ณ๐ฒ๐ฟ๐ฒ๐ป๐ ๐๐ฟ๐ถ๐๐ถ๐ป๐ด ๐๐๐๐น๐ฒโverbose and error-proneโcompared to Satoshi's concise technicality.
Satoshi's online presence was ๐ฎ๐ช๐ฏ๐ช๐ฎ๐ข๐ญ, focusing on development rather than publicity. Wright, conversely, actively seeks media attention. His actions, including attempts to control Bitcoinโs shared ledger, the blockchain, starkly contrast with Satoshi's decentralization ethos. Furthermore, ๐๐ถ๐บ๐ฒ๐น๐ถ๐ป๐ฒ๐ ๐ผ๐ณ ๐๐ต๐ฒ๐ถ๐ฟ ๐ถ๐ป๐๐ผ๐น๐๐ฒ๐บ๐ฒ๐ป๐ ๐ฎ๐ป๐ฑ ๐ฐ๐ผ๐ฑ๐ถ๐ป๐ด ๐๐๐๐น๐ฒ๐ ๐ฑ๐ผ ๐ป๐ผ๐ ๐บ๐ฎ๐๐ฐ๐ต.
Evidence supporting Wright's claim is unconvincing. If he really were Satoshi, he could have proved it long ago by publicly signing a message using Satoshiโs private key, but he has failed to do so. ๐๐ฆ ๐ข๐ญ๐ด๐ฐ ๐ฅ๐ช๐ด๐ฑ๐ญ๐ข๐บ๐ด ๐ถ๐ฏ๐ง๐ข๐ฎ๐ช๐ญ๐ช๐ข๐ณ๐ช๐ต๐บ ๐ธ๐ช๐ต๐ฉ ๐๐ช๐ต๐ค๐ฐ๐ช๐ฏ'๐ด ๐ฆ๐ข๐ณ๐ญ๐ช๐ฆ๐ด๐ต ๐ฅ๐ข๐บ๐ด, ๐ข๐ฏ๐ฅ ๐ฐ๐ง๐ต๐ฆ๐ฏ ๐ค๐ฐ๐ฏ๐ต๐ณ๐ข๐ฅ๐ช๐ค๐ต๐ด ๐ฃ๐ข๐ด๐ช๐ค ๐ฑ๐ณ๐ช๐ฏ๐ค๐ช๐ฑ๐ญ๐ฆ๐ด ๐ต๐ฉ๐ข๐ต ๐๐ข๐ต๐ฐ๐ด๐ฉ๐ช ๐ญ๐ช๐ท๐ฆ๐ฅ ๐ฃ๐บ. Consequently, Bitcoiners largely view Wright's assertions with skepticism, questioning his motives.
In sum, his discrepancies in involvement, writing, and principles, along with a complete lack of hard evidence, make it ๐ฆ๐น๐ค๐ฆ๐ฆ๐ฅ๐ช๐ฏ๐จ๐ญ๐บ ๐ถ๐ฏ๐ญ๐ช๐ฌ๐ฆ๐ญ๐บ that Craig Wright is Satoshi Nakamoto. One could even say that ๐ถ๐โ๐ ๐ณ๐ฎ๐ฟ ๐บ๐ผ๐ฟ๐ฒ ๐น๐ถ๐ธ๐ฒ๐น๐ ๐๐ต๐ฎ๐ ๐๐ผ๐ ๐๐ถ๐น๐น ๐ด๐๐ฒ๐๐ ๐ฆ๐ฎ๐๐ผ๐๐ต๐ถ'๐ ๐ฝ๐ฟ๐ถ๐๐ฎ๐๐ฒ ๐ธ๐ฒ๐, ๐๐ต๐ฎ๐ป ๐ณ๐ผ๐ฟ ๐๐ฟ๐ฎ๐ถ๐ด ๐ช๐ฟ๐ถ๐ด๐ต๐ ๐๐ผ ๐ฎ๐ฐ๐๐๐ฎ๐น๐น๐ ๐ฏ๐ฒ ๐ฆ๐ฎ๐๐ผ๐๐ต๐ถ ๐ก๐ฎ๐ธ๐ฎ๐บ๐ผ๐๐ผ.
Be sure to ๐๐ถ๐ธ๐ฒ๐ค and ๐ฆ๐ต๐ฎ๐ฟ๐ฒ๐ this, and save it in your ๐๐ผ๐ผ๐ธ๐บ๐ฎ๐ฟ๐ธ๐๐
What do you think? Is Craig Wright Satoshi Nakamoto? Why or why not?
Write your answer in the ๐๐ผ๐บ๐บ๐ฒ๐ป๐๐โฌ๏ธ
I usually only answer this question with a chuckle, but in light of todayโs trial with the Crypto Open Patent Alliance (COPA), it seems a good time to fully weigh-in on this issue.
This question is so ridiculous, I intend this to be the ๐ฐ๐ฏ๐ญ๐บ time I will give it any serious consideration.
Craig Wright's claim to be Satoshi Nakamoto, the pseudonymous creator of #Bitcoin, ๐น๐ฎ๐ฐ๐ธ๐ ๐ฐ๐ฟ๐ฒ๐ฑ๐ถ๐ฏ๐ถ๐น๐ถ๐๐ ๐ผ๐ป ๐บ๐๐น๐๐ถ๐ฝ๐น๐ฒ ๐ณ๐ฟ๐ผ๐ป๐๐. Unlike Satoshi, who was deeply involved in Bitcoin's early development, Wright appeared ๐บ๐ฆ๐ข๐ณ๐ด later, and with ๐ฎ ๐ฐ๐ผ๐บ๐ฝ๐น๐ฒ๐๐ฒ๐น๐ ๐ฑ๐ถ๐ณ๐ณ๐ฒ๐ฟ๐ฒ๐ป๐ ๐๐ฟ๐ถ๐๐ถ๐ป๐ด ๐๐๐๐น๐ฒโverbose and error-proneโcompared to Satoshi's concise technicality.
Satoshi's online presence was ๐ฎ๐ช๐ฏ๐ช๐ฎ๐ข๐ญ, focusing on development rather than publicity. Wright, conversely, actively seeks media attention. His actions, including attempts to control Bitcoinโs shared ledger, the blockchain, starkly contrast with Satoshi's decentralization ethos. Furthermore, ๐๐ถ๐บ๐ฒ๐น๐ถ๐ป๐ฒ๐ ๐ผ๐ณ ๐๐ต๐ฒ๐ถ๐ฟ ๐ถ๐ป๐๐ผ๐น๐๐ฒ๐บ๐ฒ๐ป๐ ๐ฎ๐ป๐ฑ ๐ฐ๐ผ๐ฑ๐ถ๐ป๐ด ๐๐๐๐น๐ฒ๐ ๐ฑ๐ผ ๐ป๐ผ๐ ๐บ๐ฎ๐๐ฐ๐ต.
Evidence supporting Wright's claim is unconvincing. If he really were Satoshi, he could have proved it long ago by publicly signing a message using Satoshiโs private key, but he has failed to do so. ๐๐ฆ ๐ข๐ญ๐ด๐ฐ ๐ฅ๐ช๐ด๐ฑ๐ญ๐ข๐บ๐ด ๐ถ๐ฏ๐ง๐ข๐ฎ๐ช๐ญ๐ช๐ข๐ณ๐ช๐ต๐บ ๐ธ๐ช๐ต๐ฉ ๐๐ช๐ต๐ค๐ฐ๐ช๐ฏ'๐ด ๐ฆ๐ข๐ณ๐ญ๐ช๐ฆ๐ด๐ต ๐ฅ๐ข๐บ๐ด, ๐ข๐ฏ๐ฅ ๐ฐ๐ง๐ต๐ฆ๐ฏ ๐ค๐ฐ๐ฏ๐ต๐ณ๐ข๐ฅ๐ช๐ค๐ต๐ด ๐ฃ๐ข๐ด๐ช๐ค ๐ฑ๐ณ๐ช๐ฏ๐ค๐ช๐ฑ๐ญ๐ฆ๐ด ๐ต๐ฉ๐ข๐ต ๐๐ข๐ต๐ฐ๐ด๐ฉ๐ช ๐ญ๐ช๐ท๐ฆ๐ฅ ๐ฃ๐บ. Consequently, Bitcoiners largely view Wright's assertions with skepticism, questioning his motives.
In sum, his discrepancies in involvement, writing, and principles, along with a complete lack of hard evidence, make it ๐ฆ๐น๐ค๐ฆ๐ฆ๐ฅ๐ช๐ฏ๐จ๐ญ๐บ ๐ถ๐ฏ๐ญ๐ช๐ฌ๐ฆ๐ญ๐บ that Craig Wright is Satoshi Nakamoto. One could even say that ๐ถ๐โ๐ ๐ณ๐ฎ๐ฟ ๐บ๐ผ๐ฟ๐ฒ ๐น๐ถ๐ธ๐ฒ๐น๐ ๐๐ต๐ฎ๐ ๐๐ผ๐ ๐๐ถ๐น๐น ๐ด๐๐ฒ๐๐ ๐ฆ๐ฎ๐๐ผ๐๐ต๐ถ'๐ ๐ฝ๐ฟ๐ถ๐๐ฎ๐๐ฒ ๐ธ๐ฒ๐, ๐๐ต๐ฎ๐ป ๐ณ๐ผ๐ฟ ๐๐ฟ๐ฎ๐ถ๐ด ๐ช๐ฟ๐ถ๐ด๐ต๐ ๐๐ผ ๐ฎ๐ฐ๐๐๐ฎ๐น๐น๐ ๐ฏ๐ฒ ๐ฆ๐ฎ๐๐ผ๐๐ต๐ถ ๐ก๐ฎ๐ธ๐ฎ๐บ๐ผ๐๐ผ.
Be sure to ๐๐ถ๐ธ๐ฒ๐ค and ๐ฆ๐ต๐ฎ๐ฟ๐ฒ๐ this, and save it in your ๐๐ผ๐ผ๐ธ๐บ๐ฎ๐ฟ๐ธ๐๐
What do you think? Is Craig Wright Satoshi Nakamoto? Why or why not?
Write your answer in the ๐๐ผ๐บ๐บ๐ฒ๐ป๐๐โฌ๏ธ